Permanently Deleted

  • OhWell [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Because they needed someone to blame back in 2000 without critically looking at the system, Supreme Court or daring to be angry at the other party.

    SCOTUS flat out handed the election to Bush. Libs should've been angry at them, but like with most things, that requires them to start looking at the system and status quo that they love so much, and once they look deep into that, they don't like it very much. To put it simple, they can't see the forest for the trees.

    Libs were more obsessed with civility and "taking the high ground" in 2000. Sound familiar with them in the recent few years?

    On the other hand; something that always makes me laugh is that they get so mad at the Green Party and accuse them of stealing votes from Democrats, however, the Libertarian party is a bigger deal as a third party. Gary Johnson did pretty good in 2016 and yet that was really taking votes away from Trump, but you don't hear a bunch of screaming about it from the GOP.

    They've hated Nader since 2000. It's actually a pretty damn good example that most of them aren't going to radicalize and become leftists no matter how much you degrade yourself letting these smug fuckers talk down to you. They believe in the system and the status quo. If they didn't, they would've directed their anger towards SCOTUS for handing that election to Bush, opposed to the third party candidate.