I honestly don't know what is to be done.
I'm an idiot, I'm not gonna have the solution to the conflict.
A two state deal, even a two state deal with right to return and a better distribution of the territory I don't know would work.
I feel like the tension between the two states would remain.
A one state deal where the country is pluralistic and the Palestinians are given back their homes and reparated sounds good, but like...but that sounds like a hard sell and who is to say there wouldn't be a civil war at some point?
I guess this is under the assumption of peace talks and an international agreement, the palestinians could just force demands on the israeli side, but idk how feesible some kind of huge campaign like that would be or how badly an attempt at something like that would hurt them as well as people in israel without accomplishing anything.
someone more knowledgable what is the best strategy?
Who talks about the conflict without harassing Hamas for their actions and counter revolutionary activity, who is silent about Puerto Rico, who is silent about catalonia, South Sudan, Rojava, who is willing to sacrifice LGBTQ for a 'revolutionary struggle', who is idealistic on the analysis of the history and the material conditions in the places is not actual consistent revolutionary, but a particularist.
I honestly don't know what is to be done. I'm an idiot, I'm not gonna have the solution to the conflict. A two state deal, even a two state deal with right to return and a better distribution of the territory I don't know would work. I feel like the tension between the two states would remain.
A one state deal where the country is pluralistic and the Palestinians are given back their homes and reparated sounds good, but like...but that sounds like a hard sell and who is to say there wouldn't be a civil war at some point?
I guess this is under the assumption of peace talks and an international agreement, the palestinians could just force demands on the israeli side, but idk how feesible some kind of huge campaign like that would be or how badly an attempt at something like that would hurt them as well as people in israel without accomplishing anything.
someone more knowledgable what is the best strategy?
While I agree that aoc could be better isolating the sentence into two factoids:
And saying anyone who holds them combined, or even just holds 1 is social fascist etc. might be problematic.
Who talks about the conflict without harassing Hamas for their actions and counter revolutionary activity, who is silent about Puerto Rico, who is silent about catalonia, South Sudan, Rojava, who is willing to sacrifice LGBTQ for a 'revolutionary struggle', who is idealistic on the analysis of the history and the material conditions in the places is not actual consistent revolutionary, but a particularist.