ethan [none/use name] to main • 4 years agoKeep bullying Nathan j Robinson, it's workingimagemessage-square123 fedilinkarrow-up1151file-text
arrow-up1141imageKeep bullying Nathan j Robinson, it's workingethan [none/use name] to main • 4 years agomessage-square123 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarehollowmines [he/him]hexbear14·4 years agohonestly he mostly bothers me not because his takes are bad (though they sometimes are) but because he very very badly needs an editor link
minus-squarehogposting [he/him,comrade/them]hexbear21·edit-24 years agoThere's a limited use for 10,000-word articles, yes. But there's also a benefit in giving turbo-libs who mainline everything in The Atlantic something better to read. link
minus-squarehogposting [he/him,comrade/them]hexbear2·4 years agoYeah, I think they're known for long-form journalism, certainly when compared to the 500ish-word articles you see all over the place on CNN or Fox. link
minus-squarePlantsRcoolToo [any]hexbear5·4 years agoYep. I have read many articles by him I liked but not one I thought couldn't have been just as good but literally half as long link
honestly he mostly bothers me not because his takes are bad (though they sometimes are) but because he very very badly needs an editor
There's a limited use for 10,000-word articles, yes. But there's also a benefit in giving turbo-libs who mainline everything in The Atlantic something better to read.
deleted by creator
Yeah, I think they're known for long-form journalism, certainly when compared to the 500ish-word articles you see all over the place on CNN or Fox.
Yep. I have read many articles by him I liked but not one I thought couldn't have been just as good but literally half as long