When I vote for harm reduction, I vote for the things that produce the harm I'm reducing and then attack anyone who points out the flaws in that. When the harm is produced by the harm producing harm reducers, it will make sense to me to vote for someone even worse because then they'll reach bipartisan consensus with the other harm producers to reduce harm.
Um excuse you he has a STUTTER and it is extremely ableist to point that out. Also, stutters definitely cause you to totally lose track of what you're saying mid-sentence and cause you to go tell long, rambling stories that have nothing to do with the topic at hand, and it is in no way surprising that he never stuttered when speaking until his mid-70s.
It's funny to think about how many people with "any functioning adult" bumper stickers voted for Joe, whose brain is oozing out of his ears.
When I vote for harm reduction, I vote for the things that produce the harm I'm reducing and then attack anyone who points out the flaws in that. When the harm is produced by the harm producing harm reducers, it will make sense to me to vote for someone even worse because then they'll reach bipartisan consensus with the other harm producers to reduce harm.
deleted by creator
If we reduce arm how can we reach across the aisle? We need more arm.
Um excuse you he has a STUTTER and it is extremely ableist to point that out. Also, stutters definitely cause you to totally lose track of what you're saying mid-sentence and cause you to go tell long, rambling stories that have nothing to do with the topic at hand, and it is in no way surprising that he never stuttered when speaking until his mid-70s.