In this case, it is dialectical materialism, which Nathan Robinson thinks is stupid.
Assuming this is true, there's still no "danger" here. Almost any other socialist resource will tell you about dialectical materialism. Getting people interested in socialism (and making the word safe for mainstream politics) is important work even if you disagree with some of his ideas. Leftists disagree with each others' ideas all the time.
Plus, saying that the only reason someone could dislike part of leftist theory is that they are incapable of understanding it (or refuse to read it) is nonsense. That's the exact same energy as "to be fair you have to have an extremely high IQ to understand Rick and Morty..."
Assuming this is true, there's still no "danger" here. Almost any other socialist resource will tell you about dialectical materialism. Getting people interested in socialism (and making the word safe for mainstream politics) is important work even if you disagree with some of his ideas. Leftists disagree with each others' ideas all the time.
Plus, saying that the only reason someone could dislike part of leftist theory is that they are incapable of understanding it (or refuse to read it) is nonsense. That's the exact same energy as "to be fair you have to have an extremely high IQ to understand Rick and Morty..."