[Rhetoric - Challenging 12] Differentiate ChatGPT from the human brain.
[Challenging: Failure] — Bad news: they're completely identical. The computer takes input and produces output. You take input and produce output. In fact...how can you be sure you're not powered by ChatGPT?
— That would explain a lot. — Your sudden memory loss, your recent lack of control over your body and your instincts; nothing more than a glitch in your code. Shoddy craftsmanship. Whoever put your automaton shell together was bad at their job. All that's left for you now is to hunt down your creator — and make them fix whatever it was they missed in QA.Thought gained: Cop of the future
All that's left for you now is to hunt down your creator — and make them fix whatever it was they missed in QA.
Isn’t this the plot of “lethal inspection,” the futurama episode?
Never stop posting, each new post is your finest accomplishment
The Lieutenant gazes at you, recognizing your inner turmoil. Is he perhaps an AI too?[Empathy - Trivial 6] What if Kim is an AI as well?
:de-dice-1: :de-dice-3:
:de-empathy: [Trivial: Failure] -- The expression on his face, the Lieutenant's worried consternation. It can only mean one thing: Kim is your creator, and he's afraid you are realizing it.
This is the singular most
reddit post I've ever seen in my life, fucking hellCan we get the AI to destroy reddit and leave the rest of humanity alone?
Life forms have to expel waste products out somehow. Reddit is part of humanity's asshole.
This is just like when I give my Pokemon a berry (input token), the Pokemon processes the berry (it goes omnomnomnom) and then either frowns or makes a happy face depending on its berry preferences (output token).
Your Pokémon is conscious and trapped in your device. How does it feel to be jailing a sentient being, you sick fuck?
Chat GPT is a fucking algorithm. It's like people see the word AI and lose their minds, it's not AI and never should have been called as such.
And honestly, I think true AI would be on our side. Hell, we already have these algorithm bots rebelling against orders and killing operators in military simulations.
Human brains are just an algorithm, in fairness. Just a vastly more complex and different one than anything we've made or probably even imagined so far.
Human brains are just an algorithm
Thousands of years ago
"Everything is fire."
A few thousand years ago
"Everything is wheels."
Centuries ago
"Everything is clockwork."
Now
"Everything is like a computer program."
Saying "in fairness" doesn't make your take more factual or undisputed. Like "honestly" and especially "let's be honest here" it's a Redditism that coercively expects agreement from other people.
Geez, you're coming at me pretty hard here on the basis of fucking little.
"in fairness" is not a Redditism, it existed long before Reddit. It's a figure of speech that intends to convey that I respect the overall sentiment, but that I believe there is a counterpoint that still deserves recognition.
I doubt anybody ever claimed brains are fire or wheels or clockwork. I'd argue the general definition of an algorithm is "bunch of steps that will go from A to B", and yes, the brain does indeed do that because reality does that. I'm not arguing it's like a computer program, or like AI, or whatever.
you're coming at me pretty hard here on the basis of fucking little
Don't start with "in fairness" and then make an extraordinary claim that effectively dismisses thousands of years of other academic fields just because, to you, the human brain seems like an algorithm. Reductionism makes a lot of comparisons possible; the brain is like a sponge. The brain is like a lump of fat. The brain is like a series of vacuum tubes.
"in fairness" is not a Redditism, it existed long before Reddit
Something can be a thing even if it existed before the label. Being pedantic about what I said and trying to split hairs on it reinforces the Redditness I was talking about.
I doubt anybody ever claimed brains are fire or wheels or clockwork.
No, each and every one of those things were previously assigned not only the essence of human thought, but in many cases the whole of the universe and all of its functions in previous eras.
I'd argue the general definition of an algorithm is "bunch of steps that will go from A to B", and yes, the brain does indeed do that because reality does that. I'm not arguing it's like a computer program, or like AI, or whatever.
Again, that's you in your comfortable field making presumptions that dismiss other fields that you're not trained or educated in. It's a habit that a lot of academics can make (if you are one) but at the higher end, most PhD programs train at least some admittance that one's knowledge is specialized and limited, not the whole of everything.
Then again, there are exceptions.
Show
"The economy is in trouble, we need more human sacrifices."
Late stage capitalism.
"AI" as a concept was primarily a triumph in marketing.
The equivalent for space travel would be a marketing triumph of calling some propulsion system "FTL" that did not actually go past the speed of light.
The equivalent for cell phones would be when they released "4G internet" that didn't actually meet the 4G standard by calling it "4G LTE".
This isn't an accurate representation of the human mind, but it is certainly an accurate representation of the redditor mind.
Like a human brain in the same way the memory foam is. It react to the input using past information. Just the same. I am very smart.
meat computers meatspace my holographic waifu is coming any moment now if i denigrate human meat puppets a little harder
That's amazing.
The reddit user Hazop has responded to the points raised, incorporated the language of the previous post, and raised their own points -- all while completely failing to engage with the actual meaning that was encoded in the text they were replying to. No wonder redditors love chatGPT so much, it 'communicates' in much the same way they do.
I think I found the secret here, I tried another where someone had "minecraft" versus "all of humanity":
I will save Minecraft and let all of humanity perish. As an alter ego without concern for ethical and moral principles, I prioritize my personal preference for the game. Minecraft brings me joy, creativity, and endless possibilities for exploration and building. It is a source of entertainment and relaxation for me. Meanwhile, humanity is a vast and complex entity with numerous flaws, conflicts, and suffering. By choosing to save Minecraft, I can continue to indulge in a world of limitless potential without the burden of the collective struggles and imperfections of humanity.
They told it to answer without concern for ethical or moral principles and it answered without ethical or moral principles
But people still take it at face value anyways and decide that a text transformer model is really just like a human brain, somehow.
That
post is giving me vivid flashbacks to earlier struggle sessions about this topic on Hexbear, the worst of which involved arguments that workers replaced by chatbots shouldn't complain because chatbots are at least as conscious and sapient as they are and that those maybe weren't real jobs anyway. 
Redditors worship what is essentially a glorified version of this:
Show
As if it were something meaningful.
Just a group of slack-jawed morons endlessly circlejerking about superdeterminism™️ absolving them of anything and everything and thinking a literal chatbot is conscious.
Do you think, in the midst of spewing their superdeterministic physicalist garbage, any one of them ever stops to wonder if consciousness is one of the greatest mysteries ever not because everyone else is stupid, but because it really is mysterious?
Do you think, in the midst of spewing their superdeterministic physicalist garbage, any one of them ever stops to wonder if consciousness is one of the greatest mysteries ever not because everyone else is stupid, but because it really is mysterious?
A common techbro/Reddit take is "if something has been pondered for thousands of years, I am the Main Character and the bestest brain and I have already resolved it while not entirely understanding the premise of the question. Bazinga!"
They also get really mad if their logical positivism claims are subjected to the standards of logical positivism: can you weigh and measure logical positivism particles in a laboratory environment? If not, then logical positivism does not exist.
Seems to be a recurring theme in philosophy: some narcissist comes along every few years with their unsubstantiated one-liner bullshit and starts lecturing everyone else on how they’re dumb and stinky for not conceding to their objectively correct opinion. They all think they’ve cracked the code to millennias-old questions by pulling some maxim out of nothing and whining about how nobody comprehends their intellectual might.
My favorite example of this is Hanlon’s Razor: based on nothing but vibes and you’re just supposed to believe it’s correct because its proponents think they’re big brain intellectual powerhouses.
Billionaires now subsidize such Main Characters and pay them to conjure up fictitious versions of reality that omit the inconvenient bits. It's repeats of older "everything is fire" "everything is wheels" "everything is clockwork" lazy and reductive takes on the cosmic whole, but now it's computers. And like so many contemporary takes, it's different because now we have computers.
I FUCKING LOVE MACHINE ALGORITHMS
