Permanently Deleted

  • socialist [she/her]
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 years ago

    Lmao the socialist super power trying to implement a new capitalist hegemony will give us socialism

    • volkvulture [none/use name]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      yes, state capitalism is the primary stage of socialism... Lenin says so and so does Engels, and I am not sure what theoretical or practical argument you're bringing to dispute that here lol

      unless you've invented the "communism button"... lmk!

      • socialist [she/her]
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 years ago

        Sate capitalism has only lead into capitalists gaining power again and it takes power directly away from the acual workers who are supposed to be running the country of course we need the central government for uuh what was it again? some shit about security?

        • volkvulture [none/use name]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          nah, no security is needed

          global imperialist hegemony & economic exploitation & racial/gender oppression would just disappear and leave the revolution completely alone if only the workers just spontaneously & apropos of nothing wanted it.

          oh right, and they have to ask nicely enough, and the demands have to be agreed to by the capitalists, otherwise it's "authoritarian"!

          don't worry, I'm not ancap! I just don't want pesky "STATES" in my material conditions!

          the privately owned workplace and other things I don't understand can be addressed later if only we reject legal authority of any kind!

          • socialist [she/her]
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 years ago

            How did the dictators and the state enforced hierarchy fucking go? Maybe its a time to look at what happened and move on from your texts that no one cares about anymore. Why would i need to read capital to understand that everyone has a right to housing and food and to not be opressed by any ruling hierarchies if im too utopian were not going to see anything promising like the early communist china or ussr again

            • volkvulture [none/use name]
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 years ago

              you don't care about texts, you don't care about the success of past ML/socialist projects

              what exactly do you care about other than not having to work?

              • socialist [she/her]
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                4 years ago

                I care about the tankies being wiped out their authoriatarianism didnt achieve the space race or anything like that instead they held all great that they could have become becuase they needed the state byreucracy to enforce their status

                • volkvulture [none/use name]
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  it "didn't achieve the space race"? is that your expert opinion?

                  are you sure you're here in good faith?

                  bureaucracy isn't exclusive to ML states of the 20th century.

                  Nothing you're talking about is exclusive to ML states of the 20th century lol

                  • socialist [she/her]
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    you just fucking refuse to see that the soviet union was more than just some fucking corrupt central party