Another NYT "report" that only cites unnamed "current and former white house officials" (why former? were they in the meeting?), only represents one side of the discussion, that conveniently promotes a DNC narrative (Trump unhinged and bad) and that Trump has no meaningful way of disputing.
The fact that "unnamed senior official" is now a credible news source should tell you something about what these publications are.
Another NYT "report" that only cites unnamed "current and former white house officials" (why former? were they in the meeting?), only represents one side of the discussion, that conveniently promotes a DNC narrative (Trump unhinged and bad) and that Trump has no meaningful way of disputing.
The fact that "unnamed senior official" is now a credible news source should tell you something about what these publications are.