In this thread we post our most :LIB: takes, and discuss whether that is the logical end point on a given topic or whether we need to lose that last bit of liberalism.

  • PhaseFour [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Prisons are an instrument which violently subjugates those considered "criminal" by the ruling class. It is not when you force people to go somewhere.

    • EthicalHumanMeat [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      What do you mean by "instrument"? Because guns can do all the things you described, making them prisons per your definition when used as such. I also wouldn't consider an execution to be a prison; not because it isn't a bad thing or because it's not repressive, but because it deviates too much from what people are actually referring to when they say the word prison.

      And what defines "violently"? Is locking someone in somewhere not an act of violence? And in what way does directing violence against someone for being considered a criminal differ from punishing someone for a crime?

      • PhaseFour [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        What do you mean by “instrument”? Because guns can do all the things you described, making them prisons per your definition.

        Guns alone cannot do what I'm describing. A person wielding a gun can contribute to a prison.

        I also wouldn’t consider an execution to be a prison

        Neither would I, that's just executing someone.

        And what defines “violently”?

        I would consider physical harm or withholding necessities to human life to be violence. The constant use of these are a core component of prisons. Schools, hospitals, re-education camps, etc. all include the threat of violence if someone does not comply, but the institution does not require violence to function.

        • EthicalHumanMeat [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          Guns alone cannot do what I’m describing. A person wielding a gun can contribute to a prison.

          Either the gun itself or a person wielding a gun, depending on what exactly you mean by "subjugates", is the prison. If at the very least a person with a gun doesn't qualify as a prison, then it follows that a person with a gun can't subjugate a "criminal".

          Neither would I, that’s just executing someone.

          But it's (a) an instrument which is inherently violent (b) an instrument that can subjugate criminals and ( c) is used by the ruling class to do so. So what's the difference?

          I would consider physical harm or withholding necessities to human life to be violence. The constant use of these are a core component of prisons. Schools, hospitals, re-education camps, etc. all include the threat of violence if someone does not comply, but the institution does not require violence to function.

          So if a criminal is locked in a cell, but not otherwise harmed, they aren't in a prison? Or is being locked in a cell inherently violent?