A guy throwing drive-by milkshakes at Andy Ngo from the backseat of a Prius is a technical
After listening to that pod I really wished I had the skills to make an janky indie game called “Is That a Technical?”
It’s an arena vehicle combat game with various vehicles that could be defined as technicals, including:
Toyota Hilux with a Machine Gun,
guy in Zamboni with a AK,
guy on Segway with another guy on his back with two pistols,
And of course flatbed truck with a functional Apache Attack Helicopter on it.
guy in Zamboni with a AK,
Pretty sure the conclusion they came to, that I would agree with, is that the weapon has to be mounted, so it’s part of the vehicle.
Tie a string to the AK and to the Zamboni
Technically mounted
I mean I’m down. But seriously I am a tech dumb person. I really could only come up with concept and crappy drawling.
tag yourself, im banjo-mounted kazooie shooting eggs
Structure purist doctrine radical is the true answer for what is or is not a technical.
Counterpoint: Structure radical doctrine purist is the true answer for what is or is not a technical.
A cosmonaut throwing moon rocks from a Toyota moon buggy is a technical
By column 10 (post-post-definitional) row 10 (post-deconceptual), the ontological space occupied by the denial of technicals as a definable category is a technical
You're trying to make a struggle session off an hour long podcast. Never. I am mad about your attempt.