Chomsky whines about the USSR and calls its collapse "a win for the left". Absolutely unbelievable. Of course he has nothing to say about 1993 protests or the fact that the majority of Russians who experienced life in the USSR want it back.
Zizek calls China a "bad model for the left". Of course no actual socialist experiment is ever good enough for the ivory tower intellectual. Even worse, he keeps saying he hopes that China will liberalize its government. So fuck the DotP, lets just give away power to the capitalists, because that is literally what will happen in a liberal democracy, and he knows it.
As always the correct option is Parenti
defend this
deleted by creator
I choose to be a pedantic asshole and say you said bad takes and that's a take singular
deleted by creator
scroll down
you don't need to stan slobo to be anti-fucking-nato
deleted by creator
no doubt
greenwald also stanned slobo too if i remember right, at least w/ parenti you know it's just a misguided vehicle for very deserved nato/propaganda criticism instead of greenwald's hack-contrarianism
and slobo absolutely doesn't deserve his propagandized rep. there's a particularly famous speech he made on serbian independence day just as shit was escalating (91 or 92 if I remember right) where he called for yugo unity and absolutely put the serbian crowd to sleep by not calling for croat and albanian blood.
that said, he wasn't great.
deleted by creator
Yeah, but if Chomsky has a bad take he should be fucking ostracized and when Parenti stans people who committed genocide he's just muh broken clock.
deleted by creator
Not at all and i don't even like Chomsky.
deleted by creator
insert heaps of out of context quotes here
deleted by creator
Why are you using quotes that clearly don't mean what you think they mean to misrepresent people
In what possible context could any of those quotes make you go: "hm, Chomsky's making a really good point here"?