So I never really got this one. It seems like she is a polarizing figure here, but why is that? Also, what's the joke behind the "amber" bot?
So I never really got this one. It seems like she is a polarizing figure here, but why is that? Also, what's the joke behind the "amber" bot?
How could anyone think this is a serious take?
https://twitter.com/cenkuygur/status/1333172294626074627?s=19
Same kind of people who think this tweet is 100% heartfelt and sincere.
She's being hyperbolic but she's also being serious.
If that's the interpretation, what's there to be upset about?
The obliviously hyperbolic bit (blow smoke in a kid's face) is a joke, and whatever your impression of the serious part is (probably something like "no one likes a Puritanical anti-intoxicant scold") isn't so far out in left field that anyone should have a real issue with it.
I thought it was pretty clear she was gainsaying secondhand smoke concerns, and while she's being hyperbolic about intentionally exposing babies, she also thinks she should be able to smoke where-ever she likes regardless of what anyone of the scolds think.
That's might not be unambiguously the case, but it does fit with her aloof misanthrope aesthetic.
This seems like reading the worst possible intentions into a statement that we both agree was not meant to be 100% serious.
I'm not doing exegesis here, I don't even remember exactly what was said and I'm not going to do the legwork to dig up the quote verbatim. I'm just reporting what I took away from the exchange as a possible explanation to the OP's question.
My friends also tell me they don't know when I'm being serious about things or not as well because I also have a lot of fun with post-irony and meta-irony, but I also keep it relatively anodyne, as opposed to her aloof misanthropy.