Back in March AOC was quoted as saying that she was "very concerned about U.S. interventionism in Venezuela, and I oppose it, especially when we talk about a figure like U.S. Special Envoy Elliott Abrams here. I think it’s – he’s pled guilty to several crimes related to Iran-Contra.”
She went on to add that, “I am generally opposed to U.S. interventionism as a principle, but particularly under this administration and under his leadership I think it’s a profound mistake.”
You're taking what's essentially a "no comment" response to the National Review over that. Why? No clue.
You fucking with me right now? I already covered this in a comment you replied to.
It's a right-wing rag. Coming from a right-wing rag, "bUt VuVuZelA???/" is obviously a bad-faith question. Her answer was a one-line brush off, because why the fuck would you seriously engage with that question from that outlet?
Besides, she's already on record with a more detailed statement on U.S. intervention in Venezuela, which is also quoted in the article you linked. Why are you ignoring that in favor of attacking someone on the left? What do you hope to accomplish here?
Deferring to caucus leadership on VZ
Again:
You're taking what's essentially a "no comment" response to the National Review over that. Why? No clue.
The National Review isn't even a relevant magazine lol. Why is that the hangup?
You fucking with me right now? I already covered this in a comment you replied to.
It's a right-wing rag. Coming from a right-wing rag, "bUt VuVuZelA???/" is obviously a bad-faith question. Her answer was a one-line brush off, because why the fuck would you seriously engage with that question from that outlet?
Besides, she's already on record with a more detailed statement on U.S. intervention in Venezuela, which is also quoted in the article you linked. Why are you ignoring that in favor of attacking someone on the left? What do you hope to accomplish here?