I had always assumed that if a man had gotten a woman pregnant, then if that pregnancy is carried to term, both partners should be financially responsible for the child regardless whether the man had wanted to have the child or not. The mindset being "they got them pregnant, so you have to face the consequences'".

I was talking with some people online, and they asserted that if the man did not want to have the child, then they should be able to apply to be resolved of any financial responsibility towards caring for it. I was at first against this proposal, but I feel like I now understand it better. Our current legislation was created at a time where abortion was tantamount to murder, and since it was illegal, an obligation of financial responsibility was the only way to ensure that women weren't stranded with children they couldn't afford to raise. But now that we live in a world where abortion is legal (for now), and where abortion procedures are safer than carrying the child to term, there doesn't seem to be a good argument for men still needing to be financially responsible for unwanted children. Men probably would still need to assist in paying for the procedure, but outside of that, I think they had a point. Please explain to me if there is anything I'm failing to consider here.

I also want to apologize for the binary language I used in writing this. I tried at first to write this in a more inclusive way, but I struggled wrapping my head around it. If anyone can educate me in how to write in a way that doesn't disclude non-binary comrades, I would appreciate it.

    • kristina [she/her]
      2·
      4 years ago

      youre literally arguing for a man to be able to force an abortion on someone, which would involve things being nonconsensually put into a woman's vagina. /thread

      • ofriceandruin [none/use name]
        8·
        4 years ago

        youre literally arguing for a man to be able to force an abortion on someone,

        Where did Dewot say that? Not doubting you but I don't see it.

          • ofriceandruin [none/use name]
            6·
            4 years ago

            uh oh is this the "Russian" trolls argument? I thought you weren't trying to lib-shame?

            • kristina [she/her]
              3·
              4 years ago

              no youre an american troll, worse than the russian kind.

                • ofriceandruin [none/use name]
                  3·
                  4 years ago

                  What could I do to convince you I don’t use sockpuppets? Get an admin to check IP addresses? Is that possible?

                  You can't do anything about it tbh... it's like anti-semitism smears against Corbyn: trying to fight against them is only further evidence in their eyes.

                • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  What could I do to convince you I don’t use sockpuppets?

                  Maybe not respond to stuff directed at another user?

                      • ofriceandruin [none/use name]
                        4·
                        4 years ago

                        So people who respond to tweets leveled at AOC are now AOC sockpuppets? I don't know who dewot is and your seeming paranoia about sockpuppets is hyper lib tbh.

                        • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
                          ·
                          4 years ago

                          So people who respond to tweets leveled at AOC are now AOC sockpuppets?

                          Yes, she can do about two thousand of them an hour.

                          your seeming paranoia about sockpuppets is hyper lib tbh.

                          Contrary to held belief, I am neither @kristina nor @amethystamiss, I just think their suggestion, that 1-hour-old accounts with posts only in one thread are reactionary trolls with dirty genitalia, is likely.

                          • ofriceandruin [none/use name]
                            4·
                            4 years ago

                            Or perhaps I'm someone who lurks and has never posted until now? I'm guessing that's like 90% of the people who visit this board.

            • ofriceandruin [none/use name]
              6·
              4 years ago

              For obvious reasons I'm not gonna tie my personal IP to this forum so I'm automatically a "sock puppet" troll lol.

        • kristina [she/her]
          2·
          4 years ago

          im not gonna argue with you lmao, youre a fucking reactionary. post your balls i wonder how productive they are.

            • kristina [she/her]
              3·
              4 years ago

              input into being medically raped? lol. youre parodying yourself

              personally, i think we've evolved past the need for men. infertile femboys or go home

                • kristina [she/her]
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  and your solution is that we force women to have abortions?

                    • ofriceandruin [none/use name]
                      5·
                      4 years ago

                      No. At no point did I ever actually endorse a policy.

                      It's amazing that your detractors didn't seem to notice this, yet they keep repeating it as though you did. You'd think they were CNN or MSNBC.

                    • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
                      ·
                      4 years ago

                      Society is not some all-potent incorporeal entity. It's made up of people. We know this because we live in it.

                      If the parent as an individual is not undertaking X activity or cost for the benefit of a child, then another person at-large must undertake X activity or cost who doesn't deserve to have to do that.

                      I mean, there are exceptions that prove the rule. If I were to hypnotize a man into sleeping with a woman and a child resulted, I would be responsible to some extent for that outcome.

                      ITT people are defending the idea that people have agency in becoming parents, which is true for people with a womb maybe 90% of the time and true for people with testes >99% of the time.

                      • ofriceandruin [none/use name]
                        6·
                        4 years ago

                        If the parent as an individual is not undertaking X activity or cost for the benefit of a child, then another person at-large must undertake X activity or cost who doesn’t deserve to have to do that.

                        I mean, there are exceptions that prove the rule. If I were to hypnotize a man into sleeping with a woman and a child resulted, I would be responsible to some extent for that outcome.

                        Is that you, Jordan Peterson?

                          • ofriceandruin [none/use name]
                            5·
                            4 years ago

                            You just made Jordan Peterson talking points lolol. My points are no more MRA talking points than saying "hey maybe we should recognize that de-industrialization has hurt the white working class" is an alt-right talking point. This is some real lib-brain analysis tbh.