Britain's medicine regulator has advised that people with a history of significant allergies do not get Pfizer-BioNTech's COVID-19 vaccine after two people reported adverse reactions on the first day of rollout.
Who else can't wait to participate in the vaccine lottery?
Good job linking to an article by people who literally belong to a shitty anti vax non profit (not anti-covid vax, anti vax in general) that also panics about the new world order and Bill Gates using brain mapping on their children or whatever the fuck!
A bunch of problems like what? There have been two vaccines which may be responsible for severe adverse reactions, the Johnson and Johnson one and the AstraZeneca one. NOT Moderna, or Pfizer, or Sputnik V, or Sinovac. Regardless of what you may have read in weird antivaxxer websites. And again, I can't stress this enough, it's literally already been tested on tens of thousands of people, and the first groups to be vaccinated have already began to be vaccinated, and it's not "poor people" or whatever dumb shit, if there is an issue, the issue is going to be poor communities not gaining access to the vaccine, which is exactly what happens all the fucking time.
Like it's expensive, hard to refrigerate, and getting enough doses is going to take a ridiculous amount of time. Distributing the thing is going to be a massive headache.
Would you calm down?
Good job linking to an article by people who literally belong to a shitty anti vax non profit (not anti-covid vax, anti vax in general) that also panics about the new world order and Bill Gates using brain mapping on their children or whatever the fuck!
Okay, it seemed reasonably well written and had sources that don't seem insane so I linked it. There is nothing in the article about gates beyond mentioning the foundation plays a key role.
Feel free to tell me more about this thing and why I shouldn't believe them.
Like it’s expensive, hard to refrigerate, and getting enough doses is going to take a ridiculous amount of time
...none of which have anything to do with the safety, and are EXACTLY why I am saying the problem for poor communities will be access.
Would you calm down?
Not until you stop linking to terrible anti vax websites. Do you not understand how much damage it can cause? This shit won't stop if people don't get vaccinated, and people will keep dying. There is no reason to keep trying to find problems that aren't there and pushing people to antivaxxers. There's legitimate problems that you did bring up but they are of a completely different nature.
Google the people who wrote it. It's a good rule. They're in Children's Health Defense. The first thing that pops up on Google when you search them is their anti vax shit, it's the whole point of the organisation.
Not until you stop linking to terrible anti vax websites.
Except that's not a terrible anti-vax website, it's a reasonable looking website run by bad people. All you had to say is "that's an anti-vax site" instead of freaking out like I'm deliberately sabotaging something.
There are a bunch of problems, and I don't really want to get into an argument because I feel like we're on totally different tracks here.
Take a look at the article (which I hope is BS but it's unsettling).
Good job linking to an article by people who literally belong to a shitty anti vax non profit (not anti-covid vax, anti vax in general) that also panics about the new world order and Bill Gates using brain mapping on their children or whatever the fuck!
A bunch of problems like what? There have been two vaccines which may be responsible for severe adverse reactions, the Johnson and Johnson one and the AstraZeneca one. NOT Moderna, or Pfizer, or Sputnik V, or Sinovac. Regardless of what you may have read in weird antivaxxer websites. And again, I can't stress this enough, it's literally already been tested on tens of thousands of people, and the first groups to be vaccinated have already began to be vaccinated, and it's not "poor people" or whatever dumb shit, if there is an issue, the issue is going to be poor communities not gaining access to the vaccine, which is exactly what happens all the fucking time.
Like it's expensive, hard to refrigerate, and getting enough doses is going to take a ridiculous amount of time. Distributing the thing is going to be a massive headache.
Would you calm down?
Okay, it seemed reasonably well written and had sources that don't seem insane so I linked it. There is nothing in the article about gates beyond mentioning the foundation plays a key role.
Feel free to tell me more about this thing and why I shouldn't believe them.
...none of which have anything to do with the safety, and are EXACTLY why I am saying the problem for poor communities will be access.
Not until you stop linking to terrible anti vax websites. Do you not understand how much damage it can cause? This shit won't stop if people don't get vaccinated, and people will keep dying. There is no reason to keep trying to find problems that aren't there and pushing people to antivaxxers. There's legitimate problems that you did bring up but they are of a completely different nature.
Google the people who wrote it. It's a good rule. They're in Children's Health Defense. The first thing that pops up on Google when you search them is their anti vax shit, it's the whole point of the organisation.
Except that's not a terrible anti-vax website, it's a reasonable looking website run by bad people. All you had to say is "that's an anti-vax site" instead of freaking out like I'm deliberately sabotaging something.
Calm down.
In particular, it is RFK's dumb anti vax org.
Robert Kennedy???
Yes. He is famously an antivax weirdo.
oh right Jr. I was wondering how a guy who died decades ago was driving anti-vax now.
Ah no. I forgot to add the Jr part.