Obviously excluding like Hitler, that’s a gimme.
Can be a good or a bad person.
My vote goes to Churchill or Reagan. Absolutely ignorant people of history.
Obviously excluding like Hitler, that’s a gimme.
Can be a good or a bad person.
My vote goes to Churchill or Reagan. Absolutely ignorant people of history.
Yeah but you're not really describing a fanbase here.
deleted by creator
Do they? I mean, I'm studying Applied Maths and Physics so there is lots of space fanboys I know but most people hardly even know the specific people involved. They just care about the rockets and the space shit. He isn't like Einstein or Hawking or Feynman who actually have a fanbase.
Speaking of which, Feynman. He was a creepy sexist prick but all the nerds think he is super cool because nerds think being creepy is being a "cool ladies man". The Feynman worship is extremely annoying and you won't believe how many times I've gotten incredible pushback in various physics fora or even from people irl for just pointing this out.
deleted by creator
It is somewhat established to call it a path integral formulation.
deleted by creator
Oh, didn't know that. Do you work in that kind of area?
deleted by creator
Isn't it extremely niche in the industry?
deleted by creator
Yeah I was gonna say, my impression was that any kind of quantum computing is very far into the future and requires us to know a lot more about maintaining superpositions and whatnot, which is why I was kinda surprised that industry cares about this right now.
deleted by creator
I'm a bit confused, are you saying nanoscale engineering experimentation is a bad use of money?
deleted by creator