I just discovered that Radical Reviewer believes the western account of the 1932 Ukranian famine, and I could not be more disappointed.
I just discovered that Radical Reviewer believes the western account of the 1932 Ukranian famine, and I could not be more disappointed.
*Looks up source*
https://www.britannica.com/place/Ukraine/The-famine-of-1932-33
*MFW*
So while i don't believe it. What's the Problem with britannica? The fact that's it from oxford or someplace like that?
Issue is that for the "integrity" of their publication, they will cling to the official narrative on topics like these.
Britannica was bought by an American company a while back
but specifically the Holodomor entry in Britannica was written by a non-scholar named Anne Applebaum
Anne Applebaum admits to never earning her PhD and giving up on academic pursuits in college... therefore she isn't a lecturer or a historical authority in any real sense
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqeK6slW8AEW6tI?format=jpg&name=large
the review of the book on which she has built this recent reputation as a "popularizer" of historical narratives here is quite illuminating
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/169438
Anne Applebaum is not a serious scholar of history nor is she a credible source on these matters