Except Ken knows his friends relationship with his daughter, and he knows his friends propensity to tell exaggerated, stupid stories. There were people on Twitter contacting CPS and calling bean dad a child abuser, which is pretty over the top for his stupid story. I don’t think it’s out of line to mention something in their defense if that’s all it was, but John had to go and be an edgy teenage-brained bigot. Once this became apparent, Ken logged out.
neat. and were i his friend i would not have jumped to his defense, because cps doesnt just break down doors and seize kids. theres nothing to come to the defense of or for if you know hes not a shitbag.
im not out to "cancel" either of these two, but holy fuck does the defense getting thrown up around them make me think maybe yall all should be
Guilt keeps jumping to another step of association. First it’s bean dad who is heretical. Then it’s his friends. Then it’s anyone who defends his friends. Then it’s their friends.
Cancel the whole planet and keep that guilt by association comin baby
Again, at the point of his tweets there were no accusations of racism or racist tweets yet unearthed.
Once those came up Ken never said anything.
Are you able to grasp the concept of linear time?
again at this point of his tweets he was asked about antisemetism and chose to be a dumbass that equates anti-israel with antisemitism.
are you able to grasp that?
Yeah and he realized what he said was dumb and he was starting to post cringe, apologized, and logged off
yeah and good for him. you then asked what people would do differently and i answered.
let me rephrase the answer for you:
if my friend were making tweets about abusing his daughter, i would not jump to his public defense, like an absolute dumpster fire of a human
Except Ken knows his friends relationship with his daughter, and he knows his friends propensity to tell exaggerated, stupid stories. There were people on Twitter contacting CPS and calling bean dad a child abuser, which is pretty over the top for his stupid story. I don’t think it’s out of line to mention something in their defense if that’s all it was, but John had to go and be an edgy teenage-brained bigot. Once this became apparent, Ken logged out.
neat. and were i his friend i would not have jumped to his defense, because cps doesnt just break down doors and seize kids. theres nothing to come to the defense of or for if you know hes not a shitbag.
im not out to "cancel" either of these two, but holy fuck does the defense getting thrown up around them make me think maybe yall all should be
Y’all y’all’s y’all y’all shitbag shitbag dumpster fire y’all y’all “cancel” y’all
Guilt keeps jumping to another step of association. First it’s bean dad who is heretical. Then it’s his friends. Then it’s anyone who defends his friends. Then it’s their friends.
Cancel the whole planet and keep that guilt by association comin baby
slippery slope slippery slope you cant just say people shouldnt defend racists and child abusers thats a slippery slope
shut the fuck up
It’s not a “slippery slope”. You are right in front of me Cancelling me for defending Ken who is canceled because he defended the bean dad.
You’re already down the slope. Can’t wait for you to cancel any user who comes to my defense, or to their defense. Or to that persons defense