If you took his name off the theory of Permanent Revolution, 99% of the self-identified M-L’s on here would agree with the ideas.
Like how many folks would actually disagree that the national bourgeoisies of the underdeveloped nations, the viceroys of imperialism, have been entirely incapable of leading revolutions for democratic rights?
If you took his name off the theory of Permanent Revolution, 99% of the self-identified M-L’s on here would agree with the ideas.
Like how many folks would actually disagree that the national bourgeoisies of the underdeveloped nations, the viceroys of imperialism, have been entirely incapable of leading revolutions for democratic rights?