white people be like "why yes i am an expert about this country that i've never been to, nor speak the language of, why do you ask?" https://twitter.com/SocksxMC/status/1347645834884767744
white people be like "why yes i am an expert about this country that i've never been to, nor speak the language of, why do you ask?" https://twitter.com/SocksxMC/status/1347645834884767744
Cuba not a democracy my ass
Also China has the largest legislature of any government with nearly one third of seats held by parties other than the CPC. Hard to see how that isn't democratic.
Damn :(
While it is a shame it wasn't explicitly included, the constitution does specifically state that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is illegal and shortly after the constitution was finalized the government announced that they were developing language for the family code that would make same sex marriage legal which should be official by the end of this year, so this particular line is somewhat misleading.
That's awesome, I kinda figured out wasn't removed for bigotry reasons. Seems like they just wanted some more time to work out the specifics of that or maybe not tie marriage to the constitution? Either way, good to know that they're still moving forward on solidifying that.
Almost undoubtedly, some committee members objected to the language based on that "Traditional Family" Catholic crap. But, like a good and functional bureaucracy, they found a way to compromise in such a manner that egos were massaged without sacrificing civil liberties.
Democrats sometimes almost kinda-sorta flirt with doing this shit. I remember the Clintons making noise about Civil Unions in the 90s, which would have been a big step up for gay couples, especially in states that straight up criminalized their relationships - but then Bill ended up signing DOMA and DADT rather than a Civil Unions marriage bill because they all suck.
I only wish we had Cuban-style democracy.
The dictatorship in China has close to 2 million directly elected legislators, at the township and county level. "Townships" have tens of thousands of people, and "Counties" in China have hundreds of thousands of people, for reference.
All of them run in competitive elections where there's always more candidates than open seats, and candidates are selected through a collaoborative effort between the government and local citizens.
Absolutely. The Chinese government structure and elections are fascinating and to accuse them of being undemocratic is purely a demonstration of ignorance.
I knew a guy in college who was from china, asserted that it was not democratic,but insisted that was a good thing, since it helped keep people like Trump out of office. Is this a common position, or was he a weirdo?
deleted by creator
Think about what sort of class background and incentives exist in the mind of the type of person who can go to an expensive school abroad. It's like judging all Americans based on spoiled libs overseas or frat bros who worship Roman statues.
It's "not democratic" in the sense that they don't have a massive circus every 4 years with a minor one every 2 so that the hooting hoards can "pick" a leader. It's far more democratic in the sense of "popular participation" in the government.
Authoritarianism is relative. America has always been a brutal, genocidal police state if you are black or Native, and it's never exactly been nice to immigrants from any race outside of the native white core, which has shifted over time. But hey, our Good Liberals have been fighting like hell to make sure that we all get to participate in the circus!