True but like people will get it what I mean. The formalist in me did just that right now so I don't look like a fool. If people think the OoM of 4 is possible than by definition it'll include 13 as well as 31. So I wouldn't write a paper on it or anything but people will get it. Vernacular vs. Scientific context and everything.
Oh yeah, I get that and you're right, I just think its a fucking hilarious way to talk about orgasms of all things. Catch me using estimates to make my mid-getting-dicked-down calculations easier lmao
if we're doing order of magnitude calculations here that number could get terrifying pretty easy :kombucha-disgust:
True but like people will get it what I mean. The formalist in me did just that right now so I don't look like a fool. If people think the OoM of 4 is possible than by definition it'll include 13 as well as 31. So I wouldn't write a paper on it or anything but people will get it. Vernacular vs. Scientific context and everything.
Oh yeah, I get that and you're right, I just think its a fucking hilarious way to talk about orgasms of all things. Catch me using estimates to make my mid-getting-dicked-down calculations easier lmao
you don't keep a tally every time so you can rule out outliers in your data for your predictive model? Weird.