It's probably true by this point. I'm not sure even a complete lockdown would stop it with that many active cases. Although I guess maybe it could slow it down enough for the vaccines to come and for summer to hit.
Well, if there was a lockdown earlier the disease could have been eliminated. But with that many active cases right now and with the mutations also spreading, it's not gonna happen, and in very heavily infested areas, I'm not even sure it would slow down significantly. BUT in less infested areas it should work well.
It's probably true by this point. I'm not sure even a complete lockdown would stop it with that many active cases. Although I guess maybe it could slow it down enough for the vaccines to come and for summer to hit.
the entire argument was to "flatten the curve" so hospitals didn't collapse overnight
Well, if there was a lockdown earlier the disease could have been eliminated. But with that many active cases right now and with the mutations also spreading, it's not gonna happen, and in very heavily infested areas, I'm not even sure it would slow down significantly. BUT in less infested areas it should work well.
if the lockdowns aren't working, you aren't doing them hard enough, imo
There is a limit to how "hard" you can do a lockdown.
freezing everyone in carbonite
Unironically this
Wish I had a joke for this
deleted by creator
Is it horribly contagious and turns your lungs into goo? Time to make tough decisions