so 9/11 was definitely an ‘inside job’ for any value of ‘inside’ and ‘job’ I can think of.
If this was indeed intentionally let to happen and not just a case of oversight, it wouldn't be what most of the "9/11 was an inside job" people are saying. Idk how much interaction you've had with them, but they believe it was controlled demolition, and some believe there weren't even any planes that crashed into the building at all, although that is more rare. But yeah, when people say it was an inside job, 9/10 times they mean someone literally planted explosives to blow them up, and out of those, 9/10 times it has something to do with Jews. So allow me to be very skeptical of anyone who says they're a 9/11 truther.
I used to post in a small forum where there was a number of these kinds of people around, because it had an extremely lax moderation stance, and I lurked a bit at 4chan and 8chan and whatever just to see what the fuck is going on there. Nazis don't like the status quo. So they don't really have an issue taking stuff that's wrong with it and twisting them into a horribly perverted narrative.
I'm not sure what you mean by the last sentence, but I said that most 9/11 truthers saying 9/11 is an inside job aren't saying what you are saying, and you should be very skeptical of all of them.
right, fascists start with "X is wrong" which is usually a true statement, if based on very oversimplified shit, and then say "because Y" which is a little absurd or stupid, "so we must do Z", where "Z" is literally always "exterminate the jews and kneel before your god emperor" unless they're zionists, in which case it gets weird but all that's changed is the names of groups.
and im saying that's not necessarily a reason to not point out that X is wrong
If this was indeed intentionally let to happen and not just a case of oversight, it wouldn't be what most of the "9/11 was an inside job" people are saying. Idk how much interaction you've had with them, but they believe it was controlled demolition, and some believe there weren't even any planes that crashed into the building at all, although that is more rare. But yeah, when people say it was an inside job, 9/10 times they mean someone literally planted explosives to blow them up, and out of those, 9/10 times it has something to do with Jews. So allow me to be very skeptical of anyone who says they're a 9/11 truther.
okay so you're saying literal nazis are closer to correct than libs, but they use that as an excuse to be literal nazis, so...
god its fucked up but i see no flaws in how you got there.
I used to post in a small forum where there was a number of these kinds of people around, because it had an extremely lax moderation stance, and I lurked a bit at 4chan and 8chan and whatever just to see what the fuck is going on there. Nazis don't like the status quo. So they don't really have an issue taking stuff that's wrong with it and twisting them into a horribly perverted narrative.
that is kind of the whole thing of reactionaries.
you're saying we shouldn't take away their excuses because...???
I'm not sure what you mean by the last sentence, but I said that most 9/11 truthers saying 9/11 is an inside job aren't saying what you are saying, and you should be very skeptical of all of them.
right, fascists start with "X is wrong" which is usually a true statement, if based on very oversimplified shit, and then say "because Y" which is a little absurd or stupid, "so we must do Z", where "Z" is literally always "exterminate the jews and kneel before your god emperor" unless they're zionists, in which case it gets weird but all that's changed is the names of groups.
and im saying that's not necessarily a reason to not point out that X is wrong