Permanently Deleted

  • Sphincter_Spartan [any,comrade/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    If it's an insane conspiracy theory to think America would get thousands of its citizens killed for its own gain, then is it crazy to believe America lied about WMD's in Iraq, getting thousands of their citizens (and a million Iraqis) killed for their own gain? Because they admitted to the latter, and the former isn't too different. I'm in the camp that they probably knew an attack was coming and let it happen, but I don't think it's stupid to think they outright did it themselves.

    Also very telling that she listed 'Epstein' in the conspiracies he believes. Like what about him? That he trafficked children for rich people? Because that's an established fact. She thinks talking about him is being a conspiracy theorist for aesthetic reasons, because he's talking about conspiracy stuff, regardless of it being factual. The same for the Clintons knowing Epstein, Bill Clinton is on the flight logs a few million times, but again it's about rich people and pedophilia, which she associates with cranks. Classic case of lib brain, judging by aesthetic similarity without regard for content

        • sailorfish [she/her]
          ·
          4 years ago

          For me, the acceptable range is from at minimum "he was genuinely suicidal and the guards/prison psychologist/whatever were all bribed/threatened/whatever to allow /encourage it to happen" to "he was assassinated". I don't know anybody who believes nothing hinky went down there either