I had a discussion with a girl I know about minimum wage (idk what her politics are exactly bc she's inconsistent but if I had to guess I'd say soc dem) and she was saying Biden's plan to increase the minimum wage to $15 by 2025 was the most ambitious plan in world history. She explained that with $15 min wage the US will have the highest minimum wage in the world, this was the best way to do it bc if we switched to $24 min wage overnight then small businesses would completely shut down and leave a large amount of the workforce unemployed and allow corporations like Amazon to take over.

I'll admit I'm newish to leftism and didn't really have an answer to this. Is there an argument from the left against this? also sorry to mods if I posted in the wrong place, wasn't exactly sure where this should go

  • Chapo_is_Red [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Just look at inflation rates or literally other wealthy countries with higher minimum wage. As for most ambitious, I'll quote Felix :
    "I see all these debates over whether China is communist or not, whether they’re the fucking Third Reich or something ridiculous, or they’re the saviors of humanity. They all miss this very basic fact: China overcoming mass poverty on a scale we’ve never seen, China modernizing on the timeline and scale that it has, is the only generational human accomplishment of the last 30 years. That’s it. That’s the only thing anyone actually remembers in one thousand years if we’re still here.

    They’re the only nation that has done anything at all. The United States, European Union, India, no one has any equivalent accomplishments. Oh, uninterrupted peace in Europe? Shut up! No one gives a fuck! You’d have to dig deep for something one one-hundredth as impressive.

    In America, though, you never hear about it."

      • Chapo_is_Red [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Agreed. But its more powerful imo if something happening right now is more ambitious than Biden's minimum wage proposal.

        When people say 'world history' they're being hyperbolic, usually you press them on it and they'll retract to something like "in recent history".

    • ant9 [he/him,comrade/them]
      ·
      4 years ago

      A slight variation but the one kind of inescapable fact when trying to argue against China is that it's still a developing country.

      They are starting to lay out more concrete timelines. The next 30 years will hopefully show what China is really about.