“There’s no ethical consumption under capitalism, after all.”

:capitalist-laugh: .

    • Parzivus [any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      The argument only carries over if you value dogs and humans equally, which is a fucking awful take no matter how you spin it.
      Also, no one is eating meat purely to spite vegans, at least not anyone on this website

      • eduardog3000 [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        The argument only carries over if you value dogs and humans equally, which is a fucking awful take no matter how you spin it.

        That is exactly their take. That's the problem.

      • DeepPoliSci [none/use name]
        ·
        4 years ago

        The argument only carries over if you value dogs and humans equally, which is a fucking awful take

        M4A is modern redlining because it doesn't cover my dog. I am a well-adjusted person.

        Edit: The DNC should pay me six figures for this.

        • Capitalist [none/use name]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Being against slavery is very expensive. Purchasing goods from countries which pay “livable” wages is very expensive. Much better to buy clothing made in developing countries. higher profit margin for the business as well, which is the most important part.