But do the Chinese people want more doctors? Why aren't they given a CHOICE?! :pete:
godspeed, by all means please continue dunking on the west
:xi-lib-tears:
My stocks such as they are--I'm like a $1 above minimum wage so this is not a brag it's penny stocks--are all in Chinese electric vehicles, Chinese environmental indexes and Canadian uranium companies, no joke. I'm putting the money I would've spent on weed into stocks based on rando trends I hope turn out to be right (the collapse of America).
Hey, this has been my strategy for a while too! My retirement money is almost all in Chinese companies, though I also own a bunch of Nintendo that my mom bought for me when I was a kid which is my best-performing stock by a lot.
If it ends up going to shit I'll share my two buck chuck with you in the cardboard shanties we'll live in next to the oceans that drowned North America
I would think yes, in both the short term and long term, if any end up being nationalized I would assume it would end up with a stock buyback over and above market price but I am neither an expert nor do I have any idea about the precedent.
Unfortunately I can’t read that article, the site redirects to some terrible pop up spam
I’m talking about the top article on the subreddit, the one you mention in this post, which goes to “bloombergquint.com”. Bloombergquint.com the redirects to “goodluckdog.space” which tells you that you’ve won an iPad or something.
I know you libs stan nuclear power but it's just not cutting edge technology any more. Wind or solar power come at 3 ct/kWh while nuclar power costs around 13 ct/kWh. The problem of the disposal of nuclear waste is still not solved and uranium is mined under worse conditions than cobalt. Still building nuclear power plants instead of large wind and solar power farms is not progressive.
Other than that it's pretty obvious that centralized planning beats free market economies regarding every goal other than individual enrichment.
