L'Internationale :france-cool:
The Paris Commune was established on 18 March 1871, but its roots can be traced right back to 1848, when a wave of democratic revolution originating in France washed across the European continent
In France, the democratic revolution was defeated in a matter of months, ending with the bloody suppression of a workers’ revolt protesting against the closure of the national workshops in June 1848. Despite this, the street fighting of this period laid the foundations for the establishment of an autonomous French workers’ movement, which operated independently of the centrist bourgeois political parties—a key prerequisite for the formation of the 72-day-long “Republic of Workers” in 1871.
Following the defeat of the uprising, however, a military dictatorship initially asserted control, before handing the reins to Napoleon III a few months later. East of the Rhine, in a fragmented Germany, monarchic powers were also able to put down revolutionary efforts and defeat the democracy movement. The latter’s demand for German national unity was subsequently co-opted “from above”, redefined and positioned as a project designed to suit the Prussian-led response. The policies pursued by the Prussian crown were geared towards preserving monarchic power while also seeking to unify Germany, this would led to the Franco-Prussian War.
During the Franco-Prussian war the then Emperor Napoleon III was capture during the Battle of Sedan. This sudden defeat sealed the fate of the Second French Empire, but did not signify the end of the war, with the Prussian troops marching onwards towards Paris with the aim of capturing it.
Following the defeat at the Battle of Sedan, the Third Republic was proclaimed in Paris, despite a complete lack of democratic legitimacy. Although the empire’s political and military failures meant it had been discredited, the Republic did not act to remove the monarchy. According to Marx, the measures taken by the government were evidence that they had “inherited from the empire not only ruins, but also its dread of the working class”.
By the beginning of October 1870, Paris was under total siege, beset on all sides by Prussian forces, and attempts to break the siege line with troops from the provinces had also failed. At the end of January 1871, Jules Favre, minister of foreign affairs for the Provisional Government of National Defence, signed an armistice with the newly formed German Empire
The armistice treaty stipulated that only a freshly elected National Assembly would have the power to ratify an eventual peace treaty. The assembly first met on 12 February in Bordeaux—far removed from the nation’s capital, which remained in a state of total siege by German troops.
In Paris, both the choice of location for the National Assembly as well as the make-up of the new government were viewed as betrayals of those who had spent months defending the capital against the siege.
In order to defend Paris against the German troops, in September 1870 the Thiers-led government had reorganized the National Guard and enlisted unemployed men into its regiments. This led to a change in the military’s demographic character; National Guard soldiers deposed their officers, elected new commanders from within their own ranks, and also established their own governing body, the Central Committee of the National Guard.
Having failed to capture the cannons and surprised by the workers’ resolve, Thiers decided to decamp the capital and head to Versailles, accompanied by his government and loyalist army regiments. That they were able to flee the city with ease was due to the fact that the National Guard battalions—anticipating a renewed attack by government forces—had barricaded themselves in their neighbourhood strongholds or otherwise directed their movements to avoid a confrontation.
As the sun set over Paris that evening, power in the French capital essentially resided on the streets. Given this situation, the National Guard’s Central Committee decided to cobble together a provisional government. The majority of the Parisian population first learnt of the shift that had occurred in their city the following morning, when the Central Committee occupied the Hôtel de Ville, raised a red flag, and addressed the city’s residents with their first proclamation:
You charged us with organizing the defence of Paris and of your rights.
We are conscious of having fulfilled this mission: aided by your generous courage and your admirable calm, we have chased out the government that betrayed us.
At this time our mandate has expired, and we yield it, for we don’t claim to be taking the place of those who a revolutionary wind has just overthrown.
So prepare and carry out your communal elections, and as a reward give us the only one we ever wished for: seeing you establish the true republic.
In the meanwhile, in the name of the people we will remain at the Hôtel-de-Ville.
The provisional government’s first official act was publishing a call for elections to determine the make-up of the Commune Council. The revolution of the previous day had laid the foundations for a French republic that would permanently “mark the end of the era of invasions and civil war”. Additionally, the Central Committee saw itself as the force that had defended Paris and one which would now return control of the city to its residents through the council elections.
The election took place less than ten days later, on 26 March; just two days later, the Paris Commune officially came into being. Given the urgency of organizing an election within such a short timeframe, there was scant discussion about the Commune’s actual political programme in those first few days. For this reason—according to Prosper Lissagaray, himself a Communard—votes were primarily cast based on name recognition. Consequently, the Commune Council ended up comprising a colourful mixture of Jacobins, socialists, anarchists, Romantics, and representatives of the bourgeoise opposition to Napoleon III. This meant that the Commune included powerful factions that took their political inspiration from the concepts of the bourgeoise French Revolution of 1789 right alongside proto-socialists, anarchists, and Marxists. This diversity of political positions was reflective of the century of class struggle that had preceded the founding of the Commune.
-
The Great French Revolution 1789–1793 :kropotkin-shining:
-
The story of the Paris Commune (1871) by viki1999 :france-cool:
-
The Women Incendiaries of the Paris Commune :feminism:
-
Insurgent Communards: The Road to Revolution :red-fist:
Hola Camaradas :fidel-salute-big: , Our Comrades In Texas are currently passing Through some Hard times :amerikkka: so if you had some Leftover Change or are a bourgeoisie Class Traitor here are some Mutual Aid programs that you could donate to :left-unity-3:
The State and Revolution :flag-su:
:lenin-shining: :unity: :kropotkin-shining:
Remember, sort by new you :LIB:
Yesterday’s megathread :sad-boi:
Follow the Hexbear twitter account :comrade-birdie:
THEORY; it’s good for what ails you (all kinds of tendencies inside!) :RIchard-D-Wolff:
COMMUNITY CALENDAR - AN EXPERIMENT IN PROMOTING USER ORGANIZING EFFORTS :af:
Join the fresh and beautiful batch of new comms:
!genzedong@hexbear.net :deng-salute:
!strugglesession@hexbear.net :why-post-this:
!libre@hexbear.net :anarxi:
!neurodiverse@hexbear.net :Care-Comrade:
I don't see why people are so upset over it, just ignore it, there's no obligation to weigh in
That always works, just allow the racism to fester, what could go wrong?
classifying all vegan arguments as racist seems disingenuous, if you see genuine anti-indigenous sentiment report it
pay attention to what's going on. A whole community is allowing and promoting racism. I'm going to bully them. Not continue to allow their racism to spread all over the site as the mods do next to nothing to stop it. Veganism isn't an excuse to be a racist and I'm sure there's plenty of non-racist vegans who don't fuck with what's going on right now.
I'll try to be more cognizant
Stop using the word "racism" to mean "I'm annoyed". The mods aren't your personal servants, they're not going to ban everyone you don't like. Take a fucking seat.
I'm not annoyed. I hate racists and want them gone, quickly.
You hate people who threaten the morality of your worldview, and condemning them as racists allows you to easily dismiss everything they say. You've repeated this line so many times you might even have started to believe it yourself.
you admitted to being a racist. stfu and get off the site.
I have not "admitted" to anything.
What part of "even if" do you not understand?
Racism has never killed anyone.
Removed by mod
Asking indigenous cultures to "evolve" is exactly the problem here. Every time in the past this has been tried or advocated, it involved reeducation camps and genocide. Every time anybody tries to tell indigenous folks their cultures need to "evolve," it's going to get a serious reaction from many of those folks.
EDIT: :gulag: :michael-laugh:
Wasn't that joyful to witness live?
Glorious, absolutely glorious. May the purges be heavy and plentiful tonight, comrades. :mao-aggro-shining: :chavez-guns:
:inshallah:
White people telling black and indigenous folks what to eat after they stole all their food, land, and sovereignty.
I did and the mods left it up while banning indigenous comrades questioning it from the vegan comm
Fuck that sucks
Thankfully they did eventually remove the worst comments, but fuck if someone is calling indigenous people barbarians, that is straight up chud shit
sounds like racism plain and simple
deleted by creator
There were two comments on the c/vegan post about about non-vegans being liberals (apparently secretarianism is okay when vegans do it) . One responded with a Yes. meme to being questioned if indigenous people deserved to be culturally genocided. The other was a longer comment that included a comment calling indigenous people barbarians. I reported both.
Check out the modlog people were getting banned from the comm right and left for violating Rule 2, but those comments stayed up for quite a while.
Mods need to bring the hammer down hard, it needs to be done yesterday, and there needs to be an explanation for such a colossal fuckup.
Here's the Yes. Meme comment, now removed. What is not removed is the vegan comm moderator @Beans1101 defending it. https://hexbear.net/post/94335/comment/1036024
deleted by creator
@hogposting, who I was responding to just got banned. Seriously fuck this
Honestly, this site just completely shits the bed every other day. It’s curtains for me.
Au revoir, mes amis.
I'm logging off for a long while. Possibly permanently. This post is relevant.
What a disaster.
deleted by creator
It's insane that suggesting that these 3 day old accounts don't actually shit and fart their pants everytime they see a McRib billboard is worthy of a ban.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
When will you admit that you just want to shut vegans up?
With how absolutely awful vegans have been acting, yes, that would be great at this point
Even if your allegations were true, it does not even begin to compare with murder.
And there it is
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
On the whole, vegans have not been successful at promoting their beliefs. The vast majority of people on the planet are not vegan. You should be the first people to ask whether your current approach is the best one.
And of course this is all immaterial to the larger point: I don't care if that approach works. If it wrecks this leftist space, it needs to go. You can go do it somewhere else.
this, you aren't supposed to have a hot take for everything