It depends. MGSV is the latest one, and the controls are easy to get used to since its like most other third person games. MGS3 is my favourite, and is the most popular of the original trilogy. Then theres MGS1, which is the beginning of the 3d series, and is considered one of the best games of all time.
Don't do media chronologically, that's dumb. Prequels are prequels for a reason. I haven't even played these games but I'm p sure the answer is just to play the main titles in release order, like with most things.
As others have said, just play in release order. The story is wild and wacky at times, but MGS1 is very straightforward, and MGS2 only really gets confusing if you're trying to understand the meta-narrative (you can always watch the SuperBunnyhop video for that if you want). MGS3 is also super fun and the most inward-focused of the original three, so lots of story and lore abounds for characters from the last two games.
I'm going to recommend the opposite of everyone else. I tried to get into the mgs series when 5 came out, and had a tough time.
I tried starting with MGS1, but that game is so old now I had a really tough time controlling it and it was filled with odd segments where it expects a lot more from you than many modern games. I burnt out on it and had to come back to it after playing some others to really appreciate it. If you start with 1, use a guide.
Ground Zeros is neat, but it's basically a demo for 5 which is kinda boring? I tried 5 next because it was the newest game but it's just one huge open world stealth shooter and feels empty otherwise. Its quite long and I got just over a third of the way through the main story before burning out due to lack of interest.
For me, third try was the charm and I emulated peace walker which I really enjoyed. It's shorter and simpler than 5, while not being quite as old as 1, and maintains a decent story focused on imperialism and the use of MICs and the like. It also takes place immediately before Ground Zeros so it was cool to see familiar characters and work towards where you will start in 5. I played 3 immediately after Peace Walker and enjoyed it for similar reasons. It was more concise, not ancient, and had a more compelling story.
TLDR: I recommend trying the games chronologically, as it helped me get invested with the series enough to work through the jank of the old games and the unpolished bloat of 5.
It depends. MGSV is the latest one, and the controls are easy to get used to since its like most other third person games. MGS3 is my favourite, and is the most popular of the original trilogy. Then theres MGS1, which is the beginning of the 3d series, and is considered one of the best games of all time.
MGS2 is also great, but it's so much a metacommentary on the first that it's not a good starting point
Yeah, you basically need to play MGS1 for MGS2 to make sense.
So of course, MGS2 was the only one which got released for Xbox, which lead to it being the only one I played as a kid. I was very confused.
deleted by creator
If you were to follow the series chronologically, it would go: mgs3, peace walker, mgsv, mgs1, mgs2, mgs4.
deleted by creator
Don't do media chronologically, that's dumb. Prequels are prequels for a reason. I haven't even played these games but I'm p sure the answer is just to play the main titles in release order, like with most things.
Just go with the release order, Hideo Kojima never took the chronology or canon too seriously
As others have said, just play in release order. The story is wild and wacky at times, but MGS1 is very straightforward, and MGS2 only really gets confusing if you're trying to understand the meta-narrative (you can always watch the SuperBunnyhop video for that if you want). MGS3 is also super fun and the most inward-focused of the original three, so lots of story and lore abounds for characters from the last two games.
I'm going to recommend the opposite of everyone else. I tried to get into the mgs series when 5 came out, and had a tough time.
I tried starting with MGS1, but that game is so old now I had a really tough time controlling it and it was filled with odd segments where it expects a lot more from you than many modern games. I burnt out on it and had to come back to it after playing some others to really appreciate it. If you start with 1, use a guide.
Ground Zeros is neat, but it's basically a demo for 5 which is kinda boring? I tried 5 next because it was the newest game but it's just one huge open world stealth shooter and feels empty otherwise. Its quite long and I got just over a third of the way through the main story before burning out due to lack of interest.
For me, third try was the charm and I emulated peace walker which I really enjoyed. It's shorter and simpler than 5, while not being quite as old as 1, and maintains a decent story focused on imperialism and the use of MICs and the like. It also takes place immediately before Ground Zeros so it was cool to see familiar characters and work towards where you will start in 5. I played 3 immediately after Peace Walker and enjoyed it for similar reasons. It was more concise, not ancient, and had a more compelling story.
TLDR: I recommend trying the games chronologically, as it helped me get invested with the series enough to work through the jank of the old games and the unpolished bloat of 5.