mean zack "grimdark" synder is reactionary, but the synder cut less or more shit then the whedon cut?

  • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    pros:

    • the weird cgi non-beard for superman isn't happening.

    cons:

    • it's 4 hours and 2 minutes. automatic fail.
    • the half hour epilogue of tee ups and alternate timeline shit should have been cut. batfleck and joker leto in the same scene doing a twisted dick measure? this made me want darkseid to annihilate the universe.

    general critique of both:

    • ben affleck should not be in movies anymore. probably never should've been in any, unless the part was written by a close friend who knows exactly now limited he is.
    • the entire clusterfuck of the DCEU is so hilariously plagued by the studio being jealous of the MCU IP printing stacks on stacks for Dizney, so WB is constantly doing 3 Stooges bits like all the egos trying to go through a door at the same time and getting stuck. I can't be bothered to be emotionally invested in either, so all this rigamarole and discord is the real comedy to me. I hope WB, Zach "Attack" Snyder, and the legions of piglet-fans all kill each other while Dizney cranks out so much milquetoast marvel capeshit that features more and more obscure crap until the Avengers 14 is about like Juggernaut's step-uncle working at a stamping plant in ohio and being mad at the family court system and Havok's mailman showing up to tell him to stay off the drugs and alcohol. and it makes 2 billion dollars.
    • AlexandairBabeuf [they/them]
      ·
      4 years ago

      ben affleck should not be in movies anymore. probably never should’ve been in any, unless the part was written by a close friend who knows exactly now limited he is.

      ouch totally true tho lmao