Forcing women to wear hijabs is really terrible and the traditional reason they are worn is reactionary but what you are saying is also really dumb and bad, pretty much epic Internet atheist tier stuff.
Because it makes no sense. I can't even figure out where you are going with it. Do you think individualism is when you allow people to do some stuff slightly different from other people? But then it makes even less sense for cultural practices because cultural practices are collective, it's the opposite of what seems to be your idea of individualism. Either way it really doesn't matter because it is an entirely incorrect way to approach the issue and a large misunderstanding of what individualism means in marxism.
So attack the racist motivations behind the law, then. Or does the idea of critical support only apply when supporting non-western aligned morality.
I am opposed to the racist motivations, and I'm also opposed to banning hijabs.
Removed by mod
Forcing women to wear hijabs is really terrible and the traditional reason they are worn is reactionary but what you are saying is also really dumb and bad, pretty much epic Internet atheist tier stuff.
What am I saying that's terrible and bad exactly?
That you want to literally ban people wearing religious symbols and cultural signifiers. Which is really, really dumb and bad.
Removed by mod
What? This is literal nonsense lmao
Why?
Because it makes no sense. I can't even figure out where you are going with it. Do you think individualism is when you allow people to do some stuff slightly different from other people? But then it makes even less sense for cultural practices because cultural practices are collective, it's the opposite of what seems to be your idea of individualism. Either way it really doesn't matter because it is an entirely incorrect way to approach the issue and a large misunderstanding of what individualism means in marxism.