DeepSeaDiver [none/use name]

  • 1 Post
  • 24 Comments
Joined 4 年前
cake
Cake day: 2020年7月26日

help-circle
  • From what I understand, Bryan was a theologically conservative literalist, but still had other reasons for opposing evolutionary theory.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Jennings_Bryan#Anti-evolution_activism "Bryan opposed Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection for two reasons. First, he believed that what he considered a materialistic account of the descent of man (and all life) through evolution was directly contrary to the Biblical creation account. Second, he considered Darwinism as applied to society (social Darwinism) to be a great evil force in the world, promoting hatred and conflicts and inhibiting upward social and economic mobility of the poor and oppressed."

    He was in some ways reactionary (and definitely not a socialist), but was very far from the worst politician of his time.





















  • mark my words, there's a timeline in which yang gang takes over the democratic party.

    yang has positioned himself as a progressive that's not too radical, an outsider that simps for the establishment. perfect for the party with two faces and two wings. plus there was that rumor about obama liking him, which is practically a sign of divinity.

    if aoc (or someone similar) can't capture whatever remaining "leftist" electoral energy there is (on a national level), i believe that most "progressives" who aren't terminally online will choose yang - who already endeared himself to bernie stans and tulcels this primary.

    yang gang could win the party just like trump did in 2016 - with a cult of personality and outsider rhetoric, but friendly to msnbc and pod save consumers (similar to how suburban boomers, the core of the republican party, love trump)

    yang seems like an okay guy, but i don't see him as a rebel - he's made peace with the party, already has a speech at the convention. he could be here to stay.