AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
This is why I am glad he's at the top of the trashheap for 2024... any leftist who might run worth their salt would drag him straight into obscurity over all this and more.
Democrat party
This is straight-up Republican crank speak, FYI.
I don’t see any Soc-Dem candidate getting far in that awful party
The fact that Bernie got as far as he did despite the media (a) trying to anoint Biden from the start and (b) alternately blacking him out and giving him laughably biased coverage shows this isn't true. Democrats aren't competent enough fend off any challenger, no matter how popular. Look at how they're trying and failing to primary the progressives in Congress. The problem isn't that the party establishment can just select a winner at will; the problem is that the left isn't popular enough -- yet -- to overcome establishment obstruction.
The problem isn’t that the party establishment can just select a winner at will
lmao suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuüuuuuuuure
If the party establishment can just pick whoever they want, why was Bernie in the lead going into Super Tuesday? Why have any progressives gotten elected anywhere, and why are they now facing (and beating) centrist primary challengers?
You can't simultaneously believe Democrats are incompetent enough to lose 2016 and maybe 2020, too, but also believe they have complete and total control over their primaries.
If the party establishment can just pick whoever they want, why was Bernie in the lead going into Super Tuesday?
cool what happened after that?
You can’t simultaneously believe Democrats are incompetent enough to lose
you can't believe winning was more important to them than stopping Bernie
cool what happened after that?
He lost. Does every loss mean the game was 100% rigged right from the start? Of course not.
you can’t believe winning was more important to them than stopping Bernie
Democrats absolutely prioritize winning on their own terms (i.e., not with Bernie) over winning, period, but that doesn't mean they can just go god mode on a primary and pick whatever candidate they want. Again, there is ample evidence to the contrary in the form of progressives winning elections and then defeating well-funded centrist primary challengers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_(epithet)
"Democrat Party" is literally a focus-grouped Republican smear. We can criticize Democrats without using reactionary propaganda.
M4A has overwhelmingly positive reception
And most people weren't voting on that issue alone, because "dang cheeto in the White House" centrist messaging was more effective than the messaging coming out of the left. We have to actually convince people to vote for leftist candidates; we can't just point to a poll that says something is popular and hope.
they're referring to Frank Luntz's advice to the GOP to use "democrat" instead of "democratic" as if that kind of wizardry is why dems lose and not because their job is to fight the left and they haven't delivered material benefits for four decades
No dude, he's right. Its technical name is the Democratic Party.
This is a 1990s Republican troll move. They started calling it the Democrat Party.
When Democrats went to correct them, they'd call them out for being elitists. So they eventually just gave up on it, because they lose either way.
So it’s a Republican smear to actually call the party by their name?
It's not the party's name, that's the whole point.
Imagine having faith in liberal democracy lmao. You really think that we just have to win the hearts and minds of a reactionary nation and then some day, maybe in 2042 we will get an Imperialist succdem in office who will not be able to pass anything? You really think this country has the time to do the outreach it would take to change democrats to """"socialists""""? do you think there will still be elections by then?
You really think that we just have to win the hearts and minds of a reactionary nation
Uh yeah, if we build a movement too big to ignore we can win. That's the whole premise here. Do you have a better plan? I'm all ears.
You really think this country has the time to do the outreach it would take to change democrats to “”"“socialists”"""
Look at how fast the material conditions of ordinary Americans are changing. All that's needed are people who can explain why that's happening and provide a better alternative. And again, if you have a better plan that will work more quickly, I'm all ears. I just don't see one.
I wrote a long reply then auto-update erased it so I'm just going to say that the US is headed towards fascism and nobody is prepared for it. The crisis of capitalism will not radicalize everyone by itself, most people in the US are petit bourgeois and will want to return to that class position. We need to be ready to fight that. We need to have more guns on our side because political power grows out of their barrels. We need to be organized and disciplined.
I wrote a long reply then auto-update erased it
This blows, yeah.
We need to be ready to fight that. We need to have more guns on our side because political power grows out of their barrels. We need to be organized and disciplined.
To add to that: we need a lot more people on our side than we had in the 2020 primary.
imagine thinking facts matter— did you not see what the media invented about Corbyn and Bernie this time?
We live in a post truth time, none of this shit fucking matters. Trump tells like 400 lies a minute and still has 90+ Republican support and a 30% chance of winning the election. Libs will support Coumo because "he said the right things" and ignore the actual reality of the situation. For a leftist to drag him over it they'd have to straight up call him a grandparent murderer and chant lock him up or something and frame him that way. Simply stating how bad the crisis got won't work, post truth and all that.
Republicans are completely post-truth, but Democrats are at least occasionally willing to hold candidates to their record. The problem is that stuff the left views as disqualifying isn't that big of a deal to most centrist Democrats.
If the democrats are not post truth please explain how Coumo, the person with by far the worst material outcome in the coronavirus crisis, tops this list. To me, as an outsider, the democrats are post truth, but in a different way to republicans. They use talking points like "facts first" while they lie and manipulate statistics to match their worldview (see Kamala Harris votes 93% of the time with Bernie for an example of this).
"Well I mean, he did the best he could with the hand he'd been dealt."
If they acknowledge Medicaid cuts at all "he needed to free up the funds to attack Covid in other ways" (don't expect them to explain how that's supposed to work)
That's what I mean by the democrats being post truth, none of those reasons make any sense
please explain how Coumo, the person with by far the worst material outcome in the coronavirus crisis, tops this list
Easy: no one gives a shit about primary candidates until a week or two before they vote. They definitely don't give a shit about a candidate who hasn't announced anything because the primary is four years out.
He's a name people know, so of course he gets mentioned.
Ok you got me there, still find interesting that the media pushed Coumo so hard when his initial covid response was a massive failure
The media is pushing him because twitter slapfights with Trump sell, and because he's a standard-issue capitalist Democrat who isn't going to rock any boats if elected.
they’re straight up pretending that Biden/Harris is tHe mOsT pRoGrEsSiVe tIcKeT yet
Because they are looking at their current positions, ignoring their record, limiting the scope to candidates nominated for president, and using the most charitable definition possible for "progressive." It's a bad argument, but it's at least based on some part of reality.
That's not the same as pointing to any bit of reality one doesn't like and calling it fake news.
So they don’t really hold candidates to their records
But sure, occasionally they do.
See? We can both be petty assholes who deliberately misread what the other is writing. Let's not do this.
The "occasionally" point is a big one, and it's not exclusively used on the left. Other candidates were attacked over their records in the primaries, and if you talk to your average Democrat about a candidate's record you're going to get a different response than if you talk to your average Republican. If you talk to a Democrat about Biden's shitty stance on climate change you'll get all sorts of excuses or attempted justifications, but at bottom they'll agree that climate change is a real problem. If you talk to a Republican about any Republican's shitty stance on the same issue, there's a good chance you'll get some denial of the reality of the base issue. Similarly, if you bring up Biden's "racial jungle" quote to a Democrat, they'll acknowledge the reality of the quote even if they try to defend it somehow. If you bring up some Trump quote to a Republican there's a good chance they'll claim he never said that, or that it's fake news, or that it's some Democratic hit job, etc.
If someone acknowledges the basic facts of reality you can educate them or reason with them. You can't do that with people who just write off stuff they don't like as fake.
Ask a Biden supporter about Tara Reade. How is discrediting and denying a story any different than saying “fake news”?
It's not. The difference is between pulling this with some things you don't like, and doing this with everything you don't like. If someone pulls this occasionally, it's frustrating and they're a piece of shit, but you can at least work with them the rest of the time and maybe bring them around. If someone pulls this every time there's something they don't like, how are you supposed to get anywhere with that?
The pod save america/msnbc watching dorks that carry democratic party membership will never nominate a demsoc. Even amongst millenials there's a new poll out today that says only a 1/3 of millenials are pro-socialism. So unless if we suddenly take over all of MSM we're not going to become the majority and I don't see how we can take over the Democratic party. With our limited numbers we can however OWN our spoiler status, ie. become a segment large enough to have the power to make Democrats lose elections. The way you really get on their radar as a spoiler segment of the population is by voting 3rd party. True to my word when we were on Reddit, I will never vote Democrat again and will forever vote Green. I don't care if you make your party PSL as long as you become A-NEVER-DEMOCRAT
I think it was 1/3rd pro communism and 70% said they would vote for a socialist lel
Some folks I saw on TikTok were quite enthusiastic about it. If only those Sweet Summer Children knew the true horrors of electoralism.
They're in for a very rough ride, very very soon. They'll come around soon enough.
n = 390, online
Not that we're gonna be alive in 2024 but this is just a poll of shitlibs.
It's manufacturing consent. There's nothing scientific about this.
That's a good point. You'd think someone who supposedly has an army of terminally online shitlibs working for her would've done better.
If Trump wins a silver lining will be a lot of these assholes seeing their 2024 hopes torpedoed. Harris won't go anywhere as a failed VP candidate after a failed presidential campaign, and Cuomo and Rat Boy won't have any Biden administration job to build their resumes.
I honestly don't know if anyone will survive to 2024 if that happens lol
Warren not even making the list is hilarious and gives me life.
She Ficke’s over her friend and lost a guaranteed Vp pick (which could be used for a future presidential campaign) for NOTHING.
She's 71, there wouldn't be a future pres bid for her without being VP to a one-term president who resigns due to age/health.
Wait, are they basically admitting that they know damn well that Biden won’t be around in 4 years? lol
That's what the Harris pick was about, too. If you're trying to win this year, you don't pick someone from a state that's solid blue, and you don't pick a prosecutor in the immediate aftermath of anti-police protests of an unprecedented scale. It's overconfidence through-and-through.
He literally stated on the record at one point (who cares if he walked it back) that he would only seek one term or something to that effect.
it's all meaningless though since we know Biden will resign/die before then and Kamala/Buttigeg will be the incumbent President/VP ticket and there will be no real primary challenge
I'm pretty sure he'll win, Hillary only lost by 70,000 votes in 3 states and this time Trump has no "what could go wrong, maybe he will be better than 4 more years of the same?" advantage with independents
plus Biden is infinitely more likable than Hillary was with most ppl, she was a uniquely reviled candidate
literally the same thing
his unfavorables are not as high so he is more like able, you guys are in an echo chamber for too long if you don’t see Trump losing a mile away, unless Biden literally poops his pants at the debates or something
yeah a lot like Trump got to actually be President for 4 years and prove himself as a fraud and Hillary isn’t his opponent
If Biden wins and she runs in 2024, she'll have the same lead in the primary race that Clinton had in 2016, but without the benefit of being able to bank superdelegates before winning any state primaries. There's a real opportunity for a candidate as bad as Harris to lose that primary.
It is kind of fun to shoot the shit about, and when you're as jaded as most of us are, you don't get pissy and heated about people arguing with you.
It really is a complete waste to invest actual time or energy in, though.
It's how most of the country interacts with politics. It's a limited path, but it's still incredibly valuable if you want to build a popular movement.
Perhaps but it seems the strategy should be basically what the right of the Republican Party has done for the last few decades - absolutely flood every tiny local position, school board, and uncontested position with radicals.
They've proven that a strategy like that can work. The question is whether it can work for the left, in an environment where leftist candidates can't just get a few big-money checks and have all their campaign financing needs met (and where that does happen for their opponents). The ability to raise real money through small donations is promising, but it's still probably an uphill battle.
