Image is from this Washington Post article, which shows the Shabara artisanal mine, where cobalt and copper are dug out by hand.


This preamble got much of its information from this article in ROAPE, and this article in People's World.

Countries in the imperial core have increasingly advocated for Green New Deals, whose primary goal is to re-attract manufacturing capability to somewhat counter deindustrialization, and then export some of this renewable energy generation to other countries to gain profit. Just as the initial wave of industrialization was built on massive resource exploitation of coal and iron and then oil, this wave is being built on exploiting metals like lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements. The DRC is one of the best case studies on the planet for understanding the new dynamic.

The DRC is, to your average Western country, a resource bonanza. It is the 11th largest country by land area, and contains lithium, copper, and cobalt in massive quantities, famously containing two thirds of the world's known cobalt supplies. The Western world and their institutions swarmed the DRC like piranhas, dismantling the Congo's sovereignty over its natural resources. China was not terribly involved in the privatisation process, but has stepped in to benefit from the West's work - Chinese corporations account for 40% of the production of major Congo cobalt projects (and 15 out of 19 cobalt mines), with Switzerland at 30% via Glencore, and Kazakhstan at 22%. The US, for whatever reason, withdrew from majority ownership of some projects in the mid-2010s, but is now anxious about China's position in the cobalt markets. Western countries in general have spent their time lately drawing up critical minerals strategies both to keep capitalism chugging along in their own countries, and attempt to weaken China, which invariably involves the Congo.

The Congo has attempted to resist imperialist encroachment. In 2018, the Kaliba administration asserted a new Mining Code which raised tax and royalty rates and increased state ownership in mining firms from 5% to 10%, and these changes were bitterly resisted by the West right to the end. Since 2019, under the Tshisekedi administration, the government established the state-owned EGC, which sought to take control over the processing and export of artisanal and small-scale cobalt production, which comprises 5-15% of cobalt production in the Congo. More recently, Tshisekedi is planning to move up the manufacturing chain - instead of merely mining cobalt, they want to refine it there and then make electric vehicle batteries and other such products with it, which would be an industry worth trillions of dollars. But so far, there hasn't been much movement away from having mining exports as the backbone of the economy, and it's doubtful that plans to just keep doing this until they get rich enough to build refineries and factories will work. The profits mostly go to Western countries and have failed to produce significant benefits for Congolese workers, nor resulted in the emergence of domestic industries so far. Reforms will help a little, but only a little, and they remain fundamentally constrained by the markets and the whims of the West.

Meanwhile, war and mass displacements have put immense stress on the country. There are 7.1 million displaced people in the DRC due to various conflicts and mass displacements - most recently, the war between the Congolese army and M23. Hundreds of thousands of people continue to be displaced every few months, and across the whole country, over 26 million require humanitarian aid. 6 million people have died in the eastern DRC in the last three decades, with hundreds of armed groups, both domestic and foreign, battling for resources and territory.


The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.

The Country of the Week is the Democratic Republic of the Congo! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.

Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week's thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Ideology [she/her]
    ·
    2 months ago

    In Tight Presidential Race, Voters Are Broadly Critical of Both Biden and Trump

    About half of voters say that, if given the chance, they would replace both candidates on the ballot

    Show

    Looking at these charts, it's actually incredibly easy to see how manipulation of information keeps a minority of voices in control of the voter base. Very few of them seem to wholeheartedly believe in the system. But hating the other side still captures those critical of their own party.

    • 2Password2Remember [he/him]
      ·
      2 months ago

      almost twice as many biden supporters would replace both as compared to trump supporters lol. bidens unpopularity is staggering

      Death to America

    • SoyViking [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Democracy is when 50% of voters doesn't like any of the options they're given to choose between.

      • ziggurter [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        2 months ago

        Literally there's that old liberal maxim about compromise: "If you're pissing off both sides, you're probably on the right track." brainworms

    • cricbuzz [he/him]
      ·
      2 months ago

      they would replace both candidates on the ballot

      It's her turn

      hillary-assassin

    • mushroom [he/him]
      ·
      2 months ago

      keep trump, replace biden is the galaxy-brained but actually correct position for any dem to take. rather surprised it's so vanishingly small

      • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Maybe? This poll says the majority of Biden supporters wants both out which means they're worried Trump matches even better against a Biden substitute and you know what is that even wrong? Considering who is waiting as the next likely candidate or perhaps someone just as bad? not-hillary

        The safest choice is to replace both, seems logical. But then its also a big question who would substitute Trump anyway? Still yeah given Trump actualy won an election its ok to not take that chance again if you can.

        Of course I know the real reason is closer to just "orange man bad" but ignoring that.

        • mushroom [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          i think trump in 2024 is a pretty weak candidate. trump won in 2016 bc people saw him as an unknown quantity, a slap in the face to what he considered the establishment. once he was in office and governed like a regular republican, he burned off a lot of that support, and he straight up killed a lot of his supporters with his handling of covid. he lost 2020 and since then has done nothing to gain back the voters who left him for biden, instead whining every day for the last 4 years about how it was stolen and unfair. the charm of his "petulant asshole" schtick has worn off now that everyone in the country knows that he actually is a petulant asshole and it isn't funny anymore, it just reminds you of the guy at work that you try to avoid as much as possible. he still has his base, but it's a lot weaker than it was last time he won. trump won't even be able to campaign as much as he would like because he is gonna be in court every day for the next however many weeks lol.

          a generic dem, hell even kamala, wouldn't have biden's biggest weakness, his age, but would still have the strengths against trump specifically that they wouldn't have against someone like nikki haley.

          • ziggurter [he/him, comrade/them]
            ·
            2 months ago

            He only won in 2016 because Hillary was so fucking bad. And even her campaign knew it, since they elevated Trump as the "Pied Piper candidate" out of fear that Hillary would lose to literally any other Republican.

            • mushroom [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              yeah he was a terrible candidate then too lol, the known quantity has to be pretty fucking bad for people to go with the unknown quantity. there was a reason everybody joked up until the day of the election that he was gonna lose. anybody but hillary would have crushed him. with biden it feels like a tossup but with anyone else it wouldnt even be close imo

    • FungiDebord [none/use name]
      ·
      2 months ago

      It's fun imagining what the dispositions of the, Trump supporters who want Biden replaced, are. Never-Bideners? Morons who think Trump would have a better chance against Gavin Gruesome?

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
      ·
      2 months ago

      So, half the US population refuse to participate in the sham election, a quarter would participate if both ghouls are replaced, one sixth are MAGA evenly divided between blue MAGA and red MAGA, and the rest (one twelfth) are rubes who didn't pay attention in civics class.

      • D61 [any]
        ·
        2 months ago

        "GGGOOOODDDD.... Bless... Am... air... icka!"

        "The LLAAAANNNDDD that I LOOOAAVVVEEE!"

        freedom-and-democracy