Original post here: https://hexbear.net/post/3856299?scrollToComments=false

I think we have a general path forward based on community feedback. "We see you, we hear you!"

I went ahead and unpinned the old post. I'm pinning this one for now and will edit this post when I wake up from eepy time. I had a very mid week and have no particular alarm set so be on look out. Love y'all and I'm amped for my first announcement post since coming back. :)

  • Esoteir [he/him]
    ·
    4 days ago

    But under that exception, it would be allowed for someone to post a bad take from comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views yes?

      • Esoteir [he/him]
        ·
        4 days ago

        okay, with that exception in mind, could users perform the function of dunking people who weren't public figures on the_dunk_tank?

          • Esoteir [he/him]
            ·
            4 days ago

            and the_dunk_tank and c/gossip have the same rules, aside from rule 8 where it now also links to counterpropaganda, correct?

            • replaceable [he/him]
              ·
              4 days ago

              Those were inattentively copied from the_dunk_tank, i removed reference to that rule 8 in c/gossip now, now instead the rule is just that subjects of a post must be a public person

              • Esoteir [he/him]
                ·
                4 days ago

                ah gotcha, it's good to set the rules up clearly

                so now there is no exception for posting private figures on c/gossip, right?

                  • Esoteir [he/him]
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    and the_dunk_tank held the function of providing a place where users could post a bad take from comments/posts made by a private person that have low amounts of upvotes/likes/views, provided that private person made that post or comment on other instances that are accessible from hexbear, yes?