CoolerOpposide [none/use name] to Slop. • edit-21 day agoToday’s curated slop: The comment section of the Civilization 7 announcement that Harriet Tubman will be an in-game leaderimagemessage-square72 fedilinkarrow-up193file-text
arrow-up193imageToday’s curated slop: The comment section of the Civilization 7 announcement that Harriet Tubman will be an in-game leaderCoolerOpposide [none/use name] to Slop. • edit-21 day agomessage-square72 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBoxedFenders [any, comrade/them]hexbear64·1 day agoThe US doesn't deserve to have someone as heroic as Harriet Tubman to represent it. link
minus-squareMindfury [he/him]hexbear39·edit-21 day agoluckily, Civ 7 is kinda doing the Humankind thing and separating the leaders from the civs to some extent meaning, Harriet Tubman doesn't have to lead the yankoid shitheap afaik link
minus-squareCthulhusIntern [he/him]hexbear6·1 day agoI know we're getting into more Paradox than Civ here, but I'd like to see it as, if John Brown or Nat Turner succeed, then she's the leader of the new America. link
The US doesn't deserve to have someone as heroic as Harriet Tubman to represent it.
luckily, Civ 7 is kinda doing the Humankind thing and separating the leaders from the civs to some extent
meaning, Harriet Tubman doesn't have to lead the yankoid shitheap afaik
I know we're getting into more Paradox than Civ here, but I'd like to see it as, if John Brown or Nat Turner succeed, then she's the leader of the new America.
John Brown as a Great General when?
100% true