• Esoteir [he/him]
    ·
    1 month ago

    harriet tubman never held public office!!!! pronouns

    the humble gandhi since civ 1: rizz

    • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
      ·
      1 month ago

      plus civ 7 is purposefully adding a bunch of leaders that weren't officially national leaders, people like Da Vinci or Benjamin Franklin. It makes added sense since you play as 3 different civilizations throughout the game and your civilization changes but your leader stays the same.

      • CthulhusIntern [he/him]
        ·
        1 month ago

        So does each civilization have multiple leaders, since Harriet Tubman and Benjamin Franklin are both American?

        • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          yes pretty sure most do.

          There's ~10 civilizations for each era, ~30 total. I think there will be like 45+ leaders

    • PKMKII [none/use name]
      ·
      1 month ago

      Isn’t Amaterasu in at least one of the Civ games as a national leader for Japan? If they can have a literal god as a leader then this checks out.

    • Mindfury [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      luckily, Civ 7 is kinda doing the Humankind thing and separating the leaders from the civs to some extent

      meaning, Harriet Tubman doesn't have to lead the yankoid shitheap afaik

      • CthulhusIntern [he/him]
        ·
        1 month ago

        I know we're getting into more Paradox than Civ here, but I'd like to see it as, if John Brown or Nat Turner succeed, then she's the leader of the new America.

  • BeamBrain [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Literally everything Gamergate dipshits said about "SJWs" was projection:

    • They're ridiculously sensitive and easy to offend.
    • They want to force the entire industry to conform to their politics.
    • They're single-minded obsessives who go nuclear the moment a game fails a single one of their myriad purity tests.
    • A large portion of them are tourist outsiders invading the hobby who see it as nothing but a tool to push their political agenda.

    pronouns

    EDIT: Link to a mirror that doesn't require logging in to view replies

      • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
        ·
        1 month ago

        I've played 2, 3, 5 and 6. Never played Civ 1 or Civ 4.

        My biggest gripe is not enough USSR leaders

        • Mindfury [he/him]
          ·
          1 month ago

          never played 4

          big oof, purists still really pump it up and play it (i've seen people who consider 5 a disgrace and 6 an abomination lmao)

            • GenderIsOpSec [she/her]
              ·
              1 month ago

              4 would be great with all the mods and shit, but the early 3d graphics shit is ugly and i dont say this lightly.

              the awkward move from beautiful 2d to disgusting 3d was a growth period i dont want to revisit.

              • SummerIsTooWarm [any, undecided]
                ·
                1 month ago

                It's always interesting to see different perspectives. I think the graphics of Civ IV are quite charming and I play it to this day.

                • GenderIsOpSec [she/her]
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  to each their own. I think it's because I played a lot of these in my awful teenage years, like uh... Sacrifice, Empire Earth, Soul Reaver etc.

                  Im glad you can enjoy it though! cat-trans

              • CoolerOpposide [none/use name]
                hexagon
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Yeah that’s why the graphics to 6 feel like such a step in the wrong direction to me. You have this elegant and beautiful design with 5 and then make 6 look like a mobile game?

          • Thorngraff_Ironbeard [he/him]
            ·
            1 month ago

            I played a ton of Civ 5 as a kid/teenager, Beyond Earth was the first game I got burned on buying, played some Civ 6 and like some things like the climate change and natural disasters.

        • BeamBrain [he/him]
          ·
          1 month ago

          4 is good. Probably my favorite in the series. Refined almost all of the jank out of the early series, hadn't yet introduced the all-new jank that started in 5.

      • JustSo [she/her, any]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Same. Banned for allegedly violent rhetoric against TERFS. Apparently my account was not reinstated after Musk liberated the platform for free speech lol. Now I have a permanent redirect to the proxy site via a browser plugin for when I want to see what twittoids are yapping about.

  • SoyViking [he/him]
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why is it always the leaders remembered as heroes who are in games? They should add some of the bad leaders as well, Nicholas II, the most inbred of the Habsburgs, Gorbachev, Liz Truss, all the kings with names like "Hunger" and "the Mad".

  • TomBombadil [he/him, she/her]
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sometimes I remember I'm not entirely unintelligent. Reading these comments really reminds you of the utter smoothness of most westerners brains

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him]
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s even a joke I have with myself. One second this is my internal monologue:

      “Oh come on, Zinn. You should feel lucky material conditions happened the way they did where you found the left before fascism found you! You’re not immune to propaganda, you got lucky it’s not your big brain!”

      Reads a comment section

      “On second thought, maybe it is your big brain that allows you to handle the truth.”

  • FunkyStuff [he/him]
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ok, Harriet Tubman is great, but I'm still not playing as Amerikkka when qin-shi-huangdi-fireball is right there.

  • kittin [he/him]
    ·
    1 month ago

    I like Tuabman and I like diversity in my games but I hate the implication that the USA is sufficiently not fascist and white supremacist to have her as a leader.

    • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      in the civilization universe, all civilizations are a blank slate that start during the early agrarian era. They don't yet pick an ideology or colonize others or do anything at that point. Also, in civ 7 she can be the leader of any civilization, leaders aren't bound to specific civs

      That's how I justify it to myself at least, it falls apart upon any introspection but that's how it goes with a silly 4x game with hammers and beakers

      • kittin [he/him]
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah for sure I don’t actually object to this.

      • shath [comrade/them]
        ·
        1 month ago

        "fascism is just more industrial resource and nothing else!!!" i do not like modern civ games

        • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
          ·
          1 month ago

          I agree it should have some type of penalties, but it’s hard to implement fascism if you aren’t willing to include dirty historical realities like genocide and ethnic cleansing and colonialism.

          I understand why Civ doesn’t want to allow naziboos to roleplay as a genocidal maniac in their game

            • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
              ·
              1 month ago

              Then we will lose communism as a playable option. The moment Firaxis removes fascism the “both sides” whining will be overwhelming

  • godlessworm [comrade/them]
    ·
    1 month ago

    "oh but if i said hitler should be a leader in civ then i would be called a nazi. ok i see how it is. still waiting for my white privilege check"

  • TheVelvetGentleman [he/him]
    ·
    1 month ago

    Look, I understand that people are upset, but she's crossing her arms in the picture. We haven't had a chance to oggle her cans. She could have F cups under there.