Lmao https://twitter.com/EthanBWinter/status/1424886597003120640
Someone thankfully linked this in that thread too o7 https://www.theonion.com/third-amendment-rights-group-celebrates-another-success-1819569379
Imagine how hilarious it would be if the Supreme Court decided that their logic held up, and that evictions could continue but only for troops.
This is so stupid that it loops back around to being A+ tier
like imagine going to law school just to shitpost via the legal systemThe argument is of course complete bunk and wouldn't hold up in court, but the interesting thing is that the Third Amendment Lawyers Association has chosen the anagram "þALA". According to their website :
The acronym "ÞALA" was chosen using the Old English character, the Thorn "Þ", which is pronounced as the "th" digraph... It also serves as a reminder that ÞALA will serve as a thorn in the side of anyone who attempts unlawful quartering.
Pretty tough words from a bunch of clowns who have a ".weebly.com domain" lmao
im ok with this if they issue renters an AR-15 and ammunition a month before evicting them
I've invented a machine. It detects if someone has passed the bar exam and then, if yes, kicks them in the head.
it's called creating a fake law firm and getting applicants to interview
At the Law Office of Bell & Chigurh, we pride ourselves on maintaining an efficient ship dedicated to protecting the public. From the moment you sit down in the interview room until the moment you walk into the next room and it's just the villain from No Country for Old Men with a cow gun, you will know that you are improving the health and welfare of society.
Is this like that Fred Jameson book where we do socialism by universal conscription of everyone between 16 and 65 or something?
Lmao that's hilarious, but kind of true in the most fucking dishonest reading of that amendment possible.
kind of true in the most fucking dishonest reading of that amendment possible
Constitutional law in a nutshell
By that same logic a landlord could legally deny housing to a solider for..... any reason at all.
Perhaps basing our laws around a document written in the context of a war fought with muskets isn't the greatest idea
forcing them to quarter soldiers
Hell yeah I support the "troops"
I mean yeah that’s what it says in the constitution. Maybe we shouldn’t have it anymore.
If only the American People's Liberation Army existed to give this argument weight.
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the 3rd Amendment lawyers association basically said "look, we never get any cases and no one knows we exist. I know it's a stretch, but it's the closest we're gonna get to a case."