• toledosequel [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    The libs declared it right after owning the Soviets and establishing their NWO. At the time, it wasn't a ridiculous idea at all.

    The Nazis were like excited children who brag about how they're about to win a race as they're tying their shoes only to trip and fucking DIE right after.

    • LoudMuffin [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      I actually find it incredible that people advocate for Nazism when you have OBJECTIVE proof that it ended in disaster. There are no books to debunk, no stastistics to get lost in or any abstraction about it whatsoever. You can literally take a look at a picture at the end of the Battle Of Berlin and see the end result was Germany transforming into a smoking crater

      • toledosequel [none/use name]
        ·
        3 years ago

        That alone doesn't really mean much though. Failure only breaks your ideology if you can't explain it using that world view. And you absolutely can explain the failure of Nazi Germany using an explanation consistent to the fascist worldview. It will be wrong of course, but when you've already accepted Fascism why would some shit like "Hitler lost because Stalin had some Aryan blood in him" sound ridiculous.

        A lot of them also take a sort of "blackpill", knowing Fascism failed and will never happen all they can do is look back fondly at the "good old days" and wish they were part of em.

      • furryanarchy [comrade/them,they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Fascists who advocate for the Nazis usually ignore every failure except the military ones, and claim that the military failures were purely due to strategic blunders and not due to anything inherent in Fascism.

        Their analysis of the military failures are hilarious too. Usually they resemble something a kid who read all the Wikipedia articles about WW II and can name every tank Germany made would say.

    • glimmer_twin [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      yeeeh but the idea of reaching a static society that would not advance, an 'end of history' is so moronic and idealist on its face that it's pretty hilarious