End of History was published right after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The neoliberal hegemony had just vanquished their greatest foe, so it's at least understandable that they would think they'd keep collecting W's forever.
The nazis declared a thousand year reich and then immediately poked the bear and got themselves killed
we'll do the same thing after we establish global communism only to be wiped out by the machine uprising
“We should’ve taken animal liberation seriously” we’ll shout as the bunnies load us up into adorable carrot-themed guillotines
We really should have known better than to give them those gene treatments but not mandate vegitarianism
the 'end of history' is just the the 'thousand year reich' declaration but for the American Empire :meow-shining:
You know at least with the 1000 year Reich the name acknowledges the possibility that there could be an end of the Reich and history after that
It's probably going to influence the world for 1000 years. 🤐 We still talk about Ghengis Khan.
Optimistic to think there will be another 1000 years of human history
Don't worry, if all goes right with China we'll talk about Dengist Khan for two (2) thousand years
The libs declared it right after owning the Soviets and establishing their NWO. At the time, it wasn't a ridiculous idea at all.
The Nazis were like excited children who brag about how they're about to win a race as they're tying their shoes only to trip and fucking DIE right after.
I actually find it incredible that people advocate for Nazism when you have OBJECTIVE proof that it ended in disaster. There are no books to debunk, no stastistics to get lost in or any abstraction about it whatsoever. You can literally take a look at a picture at the end of the Battle Of Berlin and see the end result was Germany transforming into a smoking crater
That alone doesn't really mean much though. Failure only breaks your ideology if you can't explain it using that world view. And you absolutely can explain the failure of Nazi Germany using an explanation consistent to the fascist worldview. It will be wrong of course, but when you've already accepted Fascism why would some shit like "Hitler lost because Stalin had some Aryan blood in him" sound ridiculous.
A lot of them also take a sort of "blackpill", knowing Fascism failed and will never happen all they can do is look back fondly at the "good old days" and wish they were part of em.
Fascists who advocate for the Nazis usually ignore every failure except the military ones, and claim that the military failures were purely due to strategic blunders and not due to anything inherent in Fascism.
Their analysis of the military failures are hilarious too. Usually they resemble something a kid who read all the Wikipedia articles about WW II and can name every tank Germany made would say.
yeeeh but the idea of reaching a static society that would not advance, an 'end of history' is so moronic and idealist on its face that it's pretty hilarious
:corn-man-khrush: :stalin-gun-1::stalin-gun-2: fuckin revisionists
Idk Nazis and fascism is still pretty pervasive
history on the other hand does not appear to ended
the arc of history bends towards justice
oh you said funnier not sadder
