Volcel jokes aside, that's unfortunate.

Overall, I do think China is on the right track. but they def. have their issues with trying to legislate morality a little too much.

I don't think Gianna Michaels/hentai is going to inspire the populace to take up arms in a capitalist revolution.

  • budoguytenkaichi [he/him,they/them]
    hexagon
    ·
    3 年前

    And I'm glad you guys still can, I just wish the official policy was different so it would be even easier/more convenient.

      • budoguytenkaichi [he/him,they/them]
        hexagon
        ·
        3 年前

        It's just getting rid of a pointless restriction on a silly thing. Porn being freely available wouldn't be a social disservice if that's what you're implying.

                  • budoguytenkaichi [he/him,they/them]
                    hexagon
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 年前

                    If I ran a government, and said there was a ban on peanut butter, but the populace still regularly got peanut butter anyway, what would be the actual point of my ban exactly?

            • Kappapillar [comrade/them,undecided]
              ·
              edit-2
              3 年前

              If it's pointless, then you're angry at an immaterial ideal rather than the material reality of the citizens themselves. You're objecting, as an outsider, to something of no consequence. People who live there experience the material conditions, so you're just vaguely gesticulating on suppositions and hypotheticals. As a Marxist-Leninist, I hereby banish you to the :gulag:
              US "freedom" brainwashing has gotten the best of us, comrade. Material conditions are what affect people the most

                  • budoguytenkaichi [he/him,they/them]
                    hexagon
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 年前

                    Prove...what? That it's silly to do that?

                    Okay, look at everywhere that does freely allow pornography. By and large porn being available doesn't significantly hurt anyone in those places, so why would it be any different in China?

        • WALLTHERICH [comrade/them]
          ·
          3 年前

          not being a social disservice is not the same thing as serving the public good

          so, what good would that serve?

          • budoguytenkaichi [he/him,they/them]
            hexagon
            ·
            3 年前

            What good is there to pointlessly ban something?

            People wanna get off and watch people fuck, I say let em' blow off some steam.

            • WALLTHERICH [comrade/them]
              ·
              3 年前

              the question is poorly asked, there is inherently no point to a pointless thing

              obviously they want to attempt to restrict either the consumption of pornography or its manufacture, whether that's because they believe doing so will achieve their population growth aims or because they think it's socially maladaptive or something, but the reason is manifestly not "for no reason"

              if you're so curious, i'd suggest looking into the whys. it's an interesting question; i just don't necessarily know that i'd take such a strong position as you have when i don't have the slightest clue why something was enacted

              • budoguytenkaichi [he/him,they/them]
                hexagon
                ·
                3 年前

                Obviously there a reason, but based on the history of anti-pornography bans throughout world history, odds are very high that that reason is not based in actual logic.

                • WALLTHERICH [comrade/them]
                  ·
                  3 年前

                  perhaps so, but i think you'll find that what is deemed logical is far from universally agreed upon. and "high odds" means nothing, aside from "i feel very strongly that this is the case". you have already acknowledged that you don't understand the reasons behind it, so it smacks of arrogance to simply claim that you know better without even investigating the situation

                  "no investigation, no etc etc" - jesus, maybe?

                  • budoguytenkaichi [he/him,they/them]
                    hexagon
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 年前

                    Okay dude, seems like you're more of a China stan than I am and that we're just gonna keep going in circles and never agree here.

                    So I agree to disagree.