It's called mediation and its what libs worship, centering everything around this idea of civility so that every scenario has both sides needing to "compromise" and come together, ignoring of course what matters which is power and one side will benefit from this "compromise" a lot more than the other, who might even suffer as a result, so "compromise" just means "status quo"
Is there a general name for this sort of argument?
Where you find oppression in literally everything including the people who are actually oppressive?
"equality poisoning" maybe?
It's called mediation and its what libs worship, centering everything around this idea of civility so that every scenario has both sides needing to "compromise" and come together, ignoring of course what matters which is power and one side will benefit from this "compromise" a lot more than the other, who might even suffer as a result, so "compromise" just means "status quo"
The paradox of tolerance, maybe? Tolerating shitty people who suffer as a direct result of their own action and defending them from criticism.
But the paradox of tolerance argument, at least the ones I've seen all support why you shouldn't tolerate fascism
tolerance poisoning
deleted by creator