At the beginning of the 1830s, nearly 125,000 Native Americans lived on millions of acres of land in Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, North Carolina and Florida–land their ancestors had occupied and cultivated for generations. By the end of the decade, very few natives remained anywhere in the southeastern United States. Working on behalf of white settlers who wanted to grow cotton on the Indians’ land, the federal government forced them to leave their homelands and walk hundreds of miles to a specially designated “Indian territory” across the Mississippi River.
Taking the journey through an unusually cold winter, they suffered terribly from exposure, disease, and starvation, killing several thousand people while en route to their new designated reserve. They were also attacked by locals and economically exploited - starving Indians were charged a dollar a head (equal to $24.01 today) to cross the Ohio River, which typically charged twelve cents, equal to $2.88 today.
Indian Removal
Andrew Jackson had long been an advocate of what he called “Indian removal.” As an Army general, he had spent years leading brutal campaigns against the Creeks in Georgia and Alabama and the Seminoles in Florida–campaigns that resulted in the transfer of hundreds of thousands of acres of land from Indian nations to white farmers. As president, he continued this genocide. In 1830, he signed the Indian Removal Act, which gave the federal government the power to exchange Native-held land in the cotton kingdom east of the Mississippi for land to the west, in the “Indian colonization zone” that the United States had acquired as part of the Louisiana Purchase. (This “Indian territory” was located in present-day Oklahoma.)
The law required the government to negotiate removal treaties fairly, voluntarily and peacefully: It did not permit the president or anyone else to coerce Native nations into giving up their land. However, President Jackson and his government frequently ignored the letter of the law and forced Native Americans to vacate lands they had lived on for generations. In the winter of 1831, under threat of invasion by the U.S. Army, the Choctaw became the first nation to be expelled from its land altogether. They made the journey to Indian Territory on foot (some “bound in chains and marched double file,” one historian writes) and without any food, supplies or other help from the government. Thousands of people died along the way. It was, one Choctaw leader told an Alabama newspaper, a “trail of tears and death.”
The Trail of Tears
The Indian-removal process continued. In 1836, the federal government drove the Creeks from their land for the last time: 3,500 of the 15,000 Creeks who set out for Oklahoma did not survive the trip.
The Cherokee people were divided: What was the best way to handle the government’s determination to get its hands on their territory? Some wanted to stay and fight. Others thought it was more pragmatic to agree to leave in exchange for money and other concessions. In 1835, a few self-appointed representatives of the Cherokee nation negotiated the Treaty of New Echota, which traded all Cherokee land east of the Mississippi for $5 million, relocation assistance and compensation for lost property. To the federal government, the treaty was a done deal, but many of the Cherokee felt betrayed; after all, the negotiators did not represent the tribal government or anyone else. “The instrument in question is not the act of our nation,” wrote the nation’s principal chief, John Ross, in a letter to the U.S. Senate protesting the treaty. “We are not parties to its covenants; it has not received the sanction of our people.” Nearly 16,000 Cherokees signed Ross’s petition, but Congress approved the treaty anyway.
By 1838, only about 2,000 Cherokees had left their Georgia homeland for Indian Territory. President Martin Van Buren sent General Winfield Scott and 7,000 soldiers to expedite the removal process. Scott and his troops forced the Cherokee into stockades at bayonet point while his men looted their homes and belongings. Then, they marched the Indians more than 1,200 miles to Indian Territory. Whooping cough, typhus, dysentery, cholera and starvation were epidemic along the way, and historians estimate that more than 5,000 Cherokee died as a result of the journey.
By 1840, tens of thousands of Native Americans had been driven off of their land in the southeastern states and forced to move across the Mississippi to Indian Territory. The federal government promised that their new land would remain unmolested forever, but as the line of white settlement pushed westward, “Indian Country” shrank and shrank. In 1907, Oklahoma became a state and Indian Territory was gone for good.
Comprehensive list of resources for those in need of an abortion :feminism:
Resources for Palestine :palestine-heart:
Here are some resourses on Prison Abolition :brick-police:
Foundations of Leninism :USSR:
:lenin-shining: :unity: :kropotkin-shining:
Anarchism and Other Essays :ancom:
Remember, sort by new you :LIB:
Follow the Hexbear twitter account :comrade-birdie:
THEORY; it’s good for what ails you (all kinds of tendencies inside!) :RIchard-D-Wolff:
COMMUNITY CALENDAR - AN EXPERIMENT IN PROMOTING USER ORGANIZING EFFORTS :af:
Come listen to music with your fellow Hexbears in Cy.tube :og-hex-bear:
Queer stuff? Come talk in the Queer version of the megathread ! :sicko-queer:
Monthly Neurodiverse Megathread and Monthly ND Venting Thread :Care-Comrade:
Join the fresh and beautiful batch of new comms:
!labour@hexbear.net :iww:
!emoji@hexbear.net :meow-anarchist: :meow-tankie:
!libre@hexbear.net :libretion:
Wmill's Moscow problems :putin-wink:
So no one got the previous answer so instead I'm :rat-salute: myself because I need the pick me up. Go me :meow-bounce: .
A previous answer
78 3/6 +21 45/90
Reasoning without equations
Some problems, alegebraic in appearance, can be solved by logic.
A two-digit number, read from right to left, is 4 1/2 times as large as from left to right. What is it?
- It is greater than 9 because it has two digits.
- It is less than 23 because 23 times 4 1/2 is greater than 100.
- It is an even number because it is an integer when it is multiplied by 4 1/2
- Nine times half of it is its reverse, so its reverse is divisible b 9.
- It has the same digits as its reverse, so it too is divisible by 9.
Like usual have fun :soviet-heart: and remember to dm @Wmill the answer.
Remember to :vote: in the movie nominations thread for this spooky October :specter:
Amerikkka Delenta Est :amerikkka:
remember a landback policy is cool and good and it must be included in any socialist US party
Genuinely forgot that MRA zealots existed for about five years
Which is weird, since men get fucked over by capitalism in enough ways you'd think the MRA crowd would be more vocal
But nah, just on Reddit, still saying the same shit
"Men are only valued for what they provide, women are valued for just existing, being a woman is so easy"
"The reason women are doing better than men in school is purely due to malicious teaching practices"
"I wish society would let me be vulnerable and emotional, anyway, isn't it a crazy how women are so emotional and hysterical"
"What about the homeless men?! What about the male suicides?! What about false rape accusations?!"
Yeah, society sure does love women, based on the backlog of rape kits and how women are assumed incompetent at everything and medieval abortion laws being approved and how society defaulted to "what if we go TOO FAR" within a day of MeToo hitting headlines and your career as an artist/actor being completely dependent on whether you're attractive and if you're even slightly famous an entire Internet/tabloid cottage industry will try to record you naked and instead about worrying about the very small chance of being accused or rape you can worry about the considerably larger chance of actually being raped, and hey, a society is clearly biased towards women if marital rape was legally considered as 'not as bad' as "real rape" up until the 2000s
Yeah, being leered at from day one of puberty and being physically weaker on average and being told "just leave that uncomfortable situation/that abusive boyfriend, what's the big deal" and being considered damaged goods if you ever admit to being raped or sexually abused or assaulted, sure is an easy life, nothing quite like having men froth at the mouth to see your ass then immediately call you a whore/slut if you exhibit any of kind of sexuality that isn't catered to male voyeurism
Yeah, men have it rough, having their value attached to expertise/wealth/intellect/humor/charisma/artistry, things that can be trained and improved, unlike those damn lazy women who have it easy by having the roulette of attractiveness spun at birth and are locked into those features until death
For a group of people who can't shut up about how strong and brave and rational and honorable and principled they are by virtue of their Y chromosome, they do a fantastic job of concealing those traits and going on about hunter-gatherers and primitive societies that they know nothing about and that they'd be banished from/die on a hunt in on day one
Damn, dealing with rightists is easier than this, since MRAs have already forfeited so they have no incentive to stop wallowing in defeatism and self-pity, there's no "let's make a better world for men, and by extension for women, and by extension our children," it's just walking away with their tails between their legs
If there's a benefit, these people refusing to marry means less kids will have to grow up with whackjob fathers