https://mobile.twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1495938071396855816
:live-tucker-reaction:
Said it before but this kid is set for life, even if the lawsuits end in nothing, he's a rock star on the right and they'll be tripping over themselves to make sure he gets what he needs.
I dunno, I can't help but feel like he's going to somehow ruin his own life in a few and end up abandoned by his fans because he's a (Trump voice) looooooo-ser.
Of course, he'll still be able to get some board position on some chud think tank and be materially comfortable.
Murder is the new way to chase clout.
Excited for the next generation of Grindset
Nah, he'll end up increasingly desperate to stay relevant as everyone forgets who he is and what he did. And that will just take a few months, not years. If he was content retiring and living a fiarly normal life he could probably do it on what he earns from this, but he'll blow it all on trying to stay in the spotlight and it will not work.
I suspect what will happen is he will "retire" from his own murderous behavior, and instead become a spokesperson for other fascists like the one who did the attack and murder a couple days ago in Portland. That could keep him relevant for a loooooong time (maybe not forever, but at least years rather than months).
Sure, but that kind of assumes there is an actual interest in making him stay relevant. He's not exactly a fountain of charisma. He can not fill a position as some kind of unifying force and sooner rather than later it will become convenient to throw him under the bus. Right wing pundits with actual clout and charisma will start to use him as an example of what the right is not, portraying him at first as a dumb kid who got himself involved in a situation he had no business being in and eventually probably calling him a murderer themselves. This will not be "facing justice" or anything like it. The people doing it will be horrid ghouls only in it to seem like the new smart right wing pundit who opposes murder and should therefore be able to support genocide unopposed.
But there is no reason for them to keep him around, and he doesn't have the charisma to defend himself the first time someone tries to rise at his expense. Being the darling of the right at the moment doesn't mean that they actually love him. They will eat him, and I cannot see him getting out of it. That's my prediction anyway, and I kind of hope it's right since he actually is a murderer. I do not look forward to whatever awful thing rises to take his place, just to it stepping on his corpse to do so, which I do think will happen.
I think technically it’s only murder if you kill someone “illegally.” And since this psycho walked he’s not technically a “murderer.” But obviously that’s bullshit.
Killer is still accurate. Dangerous psychopath is also okay. Personally I’m a fan of “Punchable faced Nazi freak with murderous intent”
"Fascist murderer" is fine. Don't let the state define criminality for us. Every U.S. president is also a war criminal, despite literally none of them ever being convicted of anything.
I 100% agree, but the court likely won’t when this little piece of shit fascist sues people for calling him a murderer
I mean, people are called murderers all the time. It's possible the injustice system will go off the deep end, but IMO it's pretty unlikely. Heck, I suspect police departments and cop "unions" would be suing left and right over that shit if it were going to stick.
Not a lawyer, but I even suspect that there's a burden-of-proof issue with this. In defamation, you basically have to prove that someone lied (i.e. prove that Rittenhouse is not a murderer, in this case). A criminal "not guilty" verdict isn't proof that someone didn't commit murder; it is a statement that it was not definitively proven ("beyond a reasonable doubt") that they ARE a murderer. It is only criminal court where you are "innocent until proven guilty". Hence why wrongful death lawsuits (where it's just "preponderance of evidence" shit) can succeed even if criminal murder charges fail.
The thickness of the knot is supposed to be similar to the width of the collar stays. He has the equivalent of a chode wrapped around his voicebox
But at least it’s not that dumbass “fancy” knot everyone was doing back in the early 10’s. Everyone doing that knot, that I knew, was some weird Ben Shapiro reader. It wouldn’t be surprising since it got famous on 9gag.
its better than the bowtie tho
edit: oh i thought we were talking about tucker. rittenhouse is definitely rocking a clip-on
Avoiding the camps because the chuds think the Young Turks are as far left as you can go.
You may live to see manmade cringe beyond your comprehension
That Tucker face, it must be stuck that way. The most watched "news" program in Amerikkka, by the way.
He crossed a witch and got cursed with permanent diarrhea cramps
I fantasize about grabbing Tucker Carlson by the eyebrows and ripping them apart.
That reminds me whatever happened to the Shitty highschoolers who was suing CNN
They settled. Kid was named Nicholas Sandman. He wrote an article for DailyMail recently about cancel culture.
:farquaad-point: the not even a month old account has reactionary options
