reading the list of ideologies "harmful to the global south" and comparing it to the ideologies that the global south has tried and gotten results from and drawing no conclusions

  • DrCrustacean [any]
    ·
    11 months ago

    Incredibly funny to me that anarcho-feminism and queer anarchism are in different tiers. Like yeah dude let's start ranking liberatory struggles good idea, tell me which types of anti racism are "very cool" and which are just "aight" next

  • HarryLime [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    there's no way I could ever know what all those flags mean also why are they polandballs

    • LaGG_3 [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      11 months ago

      there's no way I could ever know what all those flags mean also why are they polandballs

      Probably because a map-game brained 15 year old made this.

    • VHS [he/him]
      ·
      11 months ago

      That's actually the flag of the Ba'ath Party in Iraq and Syria. Both it and the Palestinian flag are based on the earlier Arab Revolt flag.

      (Not excusing this tierlist at all though, it's still awful)

  • BovineUniversity
    ·
    11 months ago

    "I like socialism until it actually exists": a tierlist.

  • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Those ideologies that turned previously backwater countries into superpowers who became the first to visit space?

    Sorry sweaty, they actually harmed those counties 💅

    • Grimble [he/him,they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Funniest part is how the dichotomy here is "harmed" vs. "never touched at all". Hmmm I wonder what their agenda is....

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
      ·
      11 months ago

      But like a capitalist supermarket, it's full of the same product repackaged 15 times.

  • RedQuestionAsker2 [he/him, she/her]
    ·
    11 months ago

    It's actually sad to me how low Ho Chi Minh thought is.

    Vietnam resisted US imperialism and won. They haven't been the target of such a focused propaganda campaign like DPRK or China. There's no reason to believe they've done anything wrong. No atrocity propaganda comes out of Vietnam. They mind their own fucking business and try to help their people.

    And still, STILL it's not good enough for western leftists. It's fucking pathetic.

    • Cromalin [she/her]
      hexagon
      ·
      11 months ago

      well the thing is the fact that they successfully fought the us means they MUST have done some great evil, right?

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
      ·
      11 months ago

      No atrocity propaganda comes out of Vietnam.

      Clearly someone hasn't seen Rambo II

    • RollaD20 [comrade/them, any]
      ·
      11 months ago

      100% i'm used to all the shit the other tendencies gets but i have no clue how someone who believes themselves to be on the left could possibly hate Uncle Ho. juche-tears

  • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
    ·
    11 months ago

    Most of these aren't real ideologies but just being an anarchist and also another thing

    • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
      ·
      11 months ago

      yeah i can't imagine being an anarchist who places any importance at all in your tendency label. like do you have a body of theory that you value? no not a page on the /r/PCM wiki, i mean something that someone who wanted to drive a stake through the heart of the state wrote.

    • Babs [she/her]
      ·
      11 months ago

      If your ideology doesn't exist in the real world, it can't do anything bad or tankie to ruin it.

  • Redcuban1959 [any]
    ·
    11 months ago

    harmful to the global south

    Chavismo

    Maoism

    Ba'athism

    Juche

    Ho Chi Mihn Thought

    Harm is when you improve the country and the living conditions

    • Torenico [he/him]
      ·
      11 months ago

      Love how all these are all unique and localized reponses from the global south yet they are damaging somehow lol. Something something civilizing mission.

    • M68040 [they/them]
      ·
      11 months ago

      I thought Tito was generally pretty well liked, too?

  • culpritus [any]
    ·
    11 months ago

    Making a tier list of how effectively different ideologies have been able to improve material conditions, but making it upside down on purpose.

    • Cromalin [she/her]
      hexagon
      ·
      11 months ago

      social democracy in the same tier as marxism-leninism

      • pudcollar [he/him]
        ·
        11 months ago

        Juche, national bolshevism, social democracy, they're basically the same thing with different names.

      • culpritus [any]
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ya, I knew I was being overly broad in that assessment when I noticed that.

        It's still mostly accurate besides a few jesse-wtf outliers like that.

  • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    4 tiers of "Hasn't made a material impact on the world" and one tier of "Has made a material impact on the world"

    I'd move Anarcho-communism/syndicalism down to the bottom tier because they also had material impact on world, while moving nazbol, "unconditional accelerationism" and... I think it says Ujaman? The green one on the very berry bottom. No offense but I haven't heard of it. Anyways, move those three out of there, and lastly merge Leninism, Marxism-Leninism, and Stalinism into one, because thats just repeating yourself three times.

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think it says Ujaman? The green one on the very berry bottom. No offense but I haven't heard of it.

      It's Ujamaa, the guiding ideology of Tanzania under Nyerere.

      • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh that's really neat actually. It can stay in the bottom row, though a shame that Tanzania acts as a U.S military outpost on the eastern coast of Africa.

  • Dolores [love/loves]
    ·
    11 months ago

    stop trying to make forms of analysis into tendencies reddit. intersectionality is not a fucking political program dog-screm

  • ReadFanon [any, any]
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Platformism: good
    Leninism, MLism, etc.: counter-revolutionary

    Council communism: aite
    Titoism: counter-revolutionary

    Liberation theology: aite
    Leninism, MLism etc: counter-revolutionary

    Egoism, anti-civ: not counter-revolutionary

    Make it make sense...

    Also this person hasn't read any Ho Chi Minh thought, nor Nyerere or Juche theory, I would bet money on this.

      • ReadFanon [any, any]
        ·
        11 months ago

        I'd go to the stuff published by Foreign Languages on Juche and what Kim Il-Sung et al. have written tbh.

        I'm far from an expert but that's where you'll find the primary sources in their own terms.

  • WalterBongjammin [they/them,comrade/them]
    ·
    11 months ago

    Good = things that now exist largely as quirky choices in the ideology section of the supermarket. Bad = anything that has actually managed to win any power

    Why is anarcho-bidenism not included in the list btw?