society as a baseline is transphobic or apathetic at best towards people who are transphobic, so most ppl don't care about her being a terf or know what terf means. most ppl aren't anti-semitic and actively dislike antisemites
nah that one I can believe. Like transphobia is from ignorance, and having your whole social knowledge challenged, after which people lash out. Unjustly ofc.
Bigots lashing out when challenged is unsurprising and they still deserve a bullet.
1000%. Do you know why people, like at the individual level, are antisemitic? Maybe it's just because I'm trans, but i've never even met a Jewish person, that I can't really imagine antisemites.
I don't care for any of those movies or games and even if I did, the woman is a terf anyway. It's just weird to me that people do this borderline conspiracy theory thinking to get offended on my behalf.
Rowling has, at the very least, a very liberal type of ignorant racism that can come from privilege, it has informed a lot of aspects of the books. Literally just about anytime a character that isn’t white is portrayed there’s some kind of sketchy element, even if it’s just lazy racist naming convention like “Cho Chang.”
Saying it’s a conspiracy theory thinking to notice the entire web of ambient white British racism in her work is, I think, being entirely too generous. But I do think it’s maybe fair to say that it’s extra highlighted bc of what an outright bigot she is to trans people
Her racism isn’t overtly or loudly white supremacist but it’s still pretty problematic, and part of the status quo, which is probably why you’re inclined to be so lenient, and still worth noting and calling out bc it helps reify that ideology in more insidious ways that tend to be imperceptible to greater liberal culture
Oh, I'm not saying that Rowling isn't the sort of racist you're describing and there are some very sketchy stuff in Harry Potter books, chiefly the whole slave elves thing.
But when people bringing up bank floor ornaments with a straight face, I start rolling my eyes.
The goblins in the lore are never depicted as totally liberated. The wizards continue to ban sentient magical creatures from owning wands, casting certain spells, living in certain areas, using money, etc. In fact, in the seventh book, the main characters try to get help from one goblin to break into a bank and are planning to trade him a mystical sword for his trouble, although their plan the entire time is to simply trick him and keep the sword for themselves.
The characters will point out how goblins and other magical creatures are oppressed, they might even be sad about it, like Dumbledore laments it at one point, but literally nothing is done to change anything. The best they can get is maybe a nicer person will run the oppressive government. Maybe the slaves will get a nicer master. can you guess JK's ideological position here
it reminds me of when people are like "tolkein's orcs aren't racist!" when in his private letters he literally describes them as "resembling the least lovely mongol types"
yeah antisemitism is generally something that is super subtly reinforced comparative to, say, transphobia, so yeah it is 100% not a tiny detail for me the fact that one of the largest book franchises has that blatant a connection to antisemitic stereotypes and the fact that the movies chose to reinforce it with those tiny details.
I'm not all that invested in this so I probably won't Google it, but the size isn't really the point. I'm not saying that Rowling personally placed a Star of David in the background just to make sure nobody missed her antisemitism, but I also find it hard to believe that nobody suggested that it might not be such a good idea to film a scene about a sub-human race of Goblin bankers while using a Jewish bank as your backdrop.
Removed by mod
yeah but her recent terf book shows how surface level her bigotry is. can you not imagine a hack writer doing the thinnest veil of bigotry
https://mobile.twitter.com/LeezartTime/status/1501226826445717505
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Hermione is literally described as having white skin in the books. This was just a cynical retcon. Either way it’s fucked up.
For real? This is one I’d never caught. Then again, RK seems to describe every single woman she doesn’t like as having “mannish” hands
deleted by creator
Holy shit it’s been there the whole time
society as a baseline is transphobic or apathetic at best towards people who are transphobic, so most ppl don't care about her being a terf or know what terf means. most ppl aren't anti-semitic and actively dislike antisemites
:doubt:
nah that one I can believe. Like transphobia is from ignorance, and having your whole social knowledge challenged, after which people lash out. Unjustly ofc.
Tf did Judaism ever do to ppl?
deleted by creator
1000%. Do you know why people, like at the individual level, are antisemitic? Maybe it's just because I'm trans, but i've never even met a Jewish person, that I can't really imagine antisemites.
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
hi :andropov-wave:
reform, but i partake in the traditions
i actually did Passover once bc one of my families friends is a psychotic evangelical
there were no jewish ppl involved out of like 20 ppl lmao
Removed by mod
i can't look at this image and think it wasn't at least a little intentional
it literally looks like something /pol/ would make if it had a budget
She didn't direct the movies though.
deleted by creator
and more importantly wrote the source material
deleted by creator
I don't care for any of those movies or games and even if I did, the woman is a terf anyway. It's just weird to me that people do this borderline conspiracy theory thinking to get offended on my behalf.
Rowling has, at the very least, a very liberal type of ignorant racism that can come from privilege, it has informed a lot of aspects of the books. Literally just about anytime a character that isn’t white is portrayed there’s some kind of sketchy element, even if it’s just lazy racist naming convention like “Cho Chang.”
Saying it’s a conspiracy theory thinking to notice the entire web of ambient white British racism in her work is, I think, being entirely too generous. But I do think it’s maybe fair to say that it’s extra highlighted bc of what an outright bigot she is to trans people
Her racism isn’t overtly or loudly white supremacist but it’s still pretty problematic, and part of the status quo, which is probably why you’re inclined to be so lenient, and still worth noting and calling out bc it helps reify that ideology in more insidious ways that tend to be imperceptible to greater liberal culture
Oh, I'm not saying that Rowling isn't the sort of racist you're describing and there are some very sketchy stuff in Harry Potter books, chiefly the whole slave elves thing.
But when people bringing up bank floor ornaments with a straight face, I start rolling my eyes.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
The goblins in the lore are never depicted as totally liberated. The wizards continue to ban sentient magical creatures from owning wands, casting certain spells, living in certain areas, using money, etc. In fact, in the seventh book, the main characters try to get help from one goblin to break into a bank and are planning to trade him a mystical sword for his trouble, although their plan the entire time is to simply trick him and keep the sword for themselves.
The characters will point out how goblins and other magical creatures are oppressed, they might even be sad about it, like Dumbledore laments it at one point, but literally nothing is done to change anything. The best they can get is maybe a nicer person will run the oppressive government. Maybe the slaves will get a nicer master. can you guess JK's ideological position here
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
pidgin English
deleted by creator
Okay but how did nobody on set think that through? Someone made a conscious decision not to cover that up with some magical runes or whatever.
deleted by creator
it reminds me of when people are like "tolkein's orcs aren't racist!" when in his private letters he literally describes them as "resembling the least lovely mongol types"
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
yeah antisemitism is generally something that is super subtly reinforced comparative to, say, transphobia, so yeah it is 100% not a tiny detail for me the fact that one of the largest book franchises has that blatant a connection to antisemitic stereotypes and the fact that the movies chose to reinforce it with those tiny details.
deleted by creator
I'm not all that invested in this so I probably won't Google it, but the size isn't really the point. I'm not saying that Rowling personally placed a Star of David in the background just to make sure nobody missed her antisemitism, but I also find it hard to believe that nobody suggested that it might not be such a good idea to film a scene about a sub-human race of Goblin bankers while using a Jewish bank as your backdrop.
deleted by creator
Removed by mod