You know what's funny? If he said he avoids playing with women because he doesn't want his viewers to harass them, that would actually be a plausible excuse.
It would be even funnier if you put a sex scene in, but exclusively describe the guy's body and actions.
Officer, I can explain! I was only writing this incredibly detailed smut to own the perverts!
He didn’t like that I didn’t heed his advice, that I did put in a shower scene but specifically to spite him I made it about the sensation of being clean, refreshed, and lightened without describing her naked body and instead describing how she’d actually feel finally having a clean and safe environment for a change.
as a woman with big "unbothered. moisturized. in my lane" energy, i can't tell you enough how much i love this.
I still remember reading a sci-fi novel (short story?) from a famous author (whose name I forgot, but he's one of those pre-70's sci-fi authors) and there were three characters in the introductory scene. I still have no idea why he felt it necessary to tell the audience about the woman's breasts; I know she has them, I really wasn't assuming otherwise.
I can't recall, but I do remember it was three of them on Mars and they were attempting to hide that they were there. I believe the people on Mars and (Earth?) were two separate factions in this story.
Oh, definitely not that. I think the author may have been Philip K Dick as for a while there I was really interested in his stories.
Gotcha. I read Rainbow Mars last year and was struck by how breastily the women boobed.
Got told by art teachers forever that I 'can't draw women'. Took me a long time to realize irs cause I draw people really really ugly, Ralph Steadman kinda ugly and not drawing women erotically weirded them out.
because he’s happy with his girlfriend
there is no eye roll big enough
He's a Wife Guy. The way Pence was a Wife Guy and wouldn't meet privately with any woman who wasn't his wife.
"they don't talk to me, so i'm not going to talk to them!"
or he's actually terrified he'll lose to a woman and feel more inferior than he already does.
Social media and random assholes streaming was a mistake. It just makes me realize how many people you'd have to :gulag: or ⚰️ in order to achieve any progress.
or he’s actually terrified he’ll lose to a woman and feel more inferior than he already does.
I have no idea who this guy is, and don't really care, but it's definitely this.
Because their identity is tied up into being a G*mer so losing, especially to a woman, invalidates them as a person. That's why you never base who you are on the media you consooooooome.
“they don’t talk to me, so i’m not going to talk to them!”
or he’s actually terrified he’ll lose to a woman and feel more inferior than he already does.
You're forgetting the third option, the male supremacist option, which is the rhetoric I see the most from the gamers. It goes something like this: "Women don't have 'environmental awareness' and 'sensory adeptness' and are 'incapable of strategic thought' therefore I don't want them on my team!"
:geordi-yes: that's because you aren't a massive piece of shit
Women turn around and create their own communities for these games and men throw a fit over "misandry".
Remember when :reddit-logo: said that the rates of women in STEM in the soviet union and post soviet states was because they were forced into it? :michael-laugh:
Wasn't that the NYT that claimed that? Or maybe The Economist, one of those rags.
I am 100% certain that that is a thing the Economist did and I have no evidence what so ever to back up my belief.
Yeah, maybe, I guess it was shared on reddit and made the rounds. Everything blurs together these days lol
The only reason that place was taken over is cuz stormfront made it a default when most of the users and the mods were heavily against it. If it was allowed to be its own space, then it could've actually become a half decent place for women there but stormfront just had to go and ruin it.
I just went and checked for myself because I don't normally go to that sub. In every single post there are at least a couple "well, actually" and "to be fair..." dudes on the bottom.
And any reasonably popular post has at least one of these guys in the comments (but usually several)
[context: a man was masturbating in front of a woman in a bus]
I'm just wondering is it already sexual Harrasment even though he did not touch u? Sure what he did is not right but can u report him for that?
[context: a 25-year-old grooming a 16-year old girl]
Mind your business. You're moralizing here. You know, what seems to be, very little of their relationship. He could be very supportive of her and a positive influence. Not every romantic relationship needs to be a 50/50 equal, contractual partnerships.
Lmao, surely he would know that this excuse would stop working eventually?
wdym, everyone knows that its common for professional gamers to have a pc that always crashes
