I will say that without capitalism, these language learning models would be great.

While I am (rightfully) not allowed to use ChatGPT to cheat during my degree, I am allowed to use it to help with my studies. Sometimes I can ask it about a term,concept or definition I'm having trouble understanding that my teacher doesn't have time to explain to me and it really helps being able to have a study tool that I can direct to mesh with my learning style. Under communism and heavily regulated, I could see such tools helping people expand their intelligence greatly.

Too bad under capitalism it will be used to generate Marvel Movies and cheap asset flip games instead.

I hate capitalism not AI.

I use it to help punch up bids for plumbing work. Ive had it flat out write whole bids for me and to be brutally honest, it does pretty fucken good too. I use it for meal recipes, meal planning.

Its fine.

Eh, it's pure novelty value. I've yet to have one give me answers that were really useful or even correct. They're all trained to have garbage politics. It's crypto again, but even more wasteful and destructive.

Imagine being a materialist and hating the tendency for the rate of profit to decline from commodity overproduction and accumulation.

Also, stuff like this keeps happening.

chatgpt is good for helping creative processes. i used it earlier today to come up with some name combos that had symbolic meaning, cos im shit at that sorta thing, and it was useful even if i had to do further research to get what i actually wanted

it is not good at replacing the work of actual people, and has made a lot of things on the internet unusable

it also can churn out genuinely harmful conspiracy nonsense and misinformation if you prompt it right, it starts the message with "oh no that's sooo bad and problematic don't do that but here you go:" then gives you 5 paragraphs.which uh. is a bit reckless, at the very least.

LLMs really are a useful tool, especially those like Perplexity search and Kagi Assistant (paid but cool) that have access to live web results or your documents. Getting a quick summary of the content of the results complete with references is great.

It's also very nice for coming up with quick outlines or lists of options. For example, I had a UX user interview, and I asked a LLM to generate a list of questions based on the user's profile and the website I'm working on. I wrote my list first and compared it to the generated list (which was better organized), coming up with a finished list that I felt very confident about.

I do think it's good for writing, too, just not in the way most people think. The folks behind IA Writer wrote a great post about using it to think more about your writing and gain another perspective. For someone like me who haaaaaaaaates bothering anyone about anything ever, having an always-available "partner" that will happily answer an infinite number of questions, deliver harsh and challenging evaluations, or brainstorm an endless number of things is incredible.

The real magic of this stuff, though, is just messing around. Stuff that you'd never take the effort to write or draw or commission but that it'd be amusing to see or read. If someone mentions that a Twitter post sounds like a poor Dennis Miller impression, I can ask a LLM for its take on a trite Miller-style monologue complete with lazy, shoehorned historical references. (Verdict: mostly accurate but too clever with similes.) And with image generators, if someone says "salm dunk" and it makes me imagine a salmon dunking a basketball, I can ask the computer to hallucinate it, and there it is right in front of my eyes, brilliant and colorful and usually weird in an unexpected day.

Was any of this productive? Did it add to anyone's bottom line? Did it need to exist? No. But the computer did a stupid magic trick and made me laugh, so it was good.

I agree. And anyone hating on AI art is simply a petty-bourgeois fascist who can’t handle their exclusive craft being available to the masses.

im kinda mixed on this. its good for certain tasks, ive made scripts and smaller programs with it but its not a replacement for humans or human creativity and shouldnt be treated as such. of course, this is capitalism so...

// Function to create and return a 'Hide' button element
function createHideButton(postHref) {
    let btn = document.createElement('button');
    btn.innerHTML = 'Hide';
    btn.className = 'btn btn-sm btn-link btn-animate text-muted py-0';
    btn.style.marginLeft = '5px';
    btn.addEventListener('click', function () {
        // Find the closest post container to the button clicked
        const postElement = this.closest('div.post-listing') || this.closest('article');
        if (postElement) {
            hidePost(postElement, postHref);
        }
    });
    return btn;
}

// Function to hide the post and save its href in local storage
function hidePost(postElement, postHref) {
    postElement.style.display = 'none'; // Hide the post
    localStorage.setItem('hidden-' + postHref, 'true'); // Mark the post as hidden in local storage
}

// Function to process and potentially hide a post
function processPost(post) {
    // Use the href attribute of the first anchor tag within the post as a unique identifier
    const postHref = post.querySelector('a').getAttribute('href');

    // Check if the post is already marked as hidden in local storage
    if (localStorage.getItem('hidden-' + postHref) === 'true') {
        post.style.display = 'none'; // Hide the post if it was previously hidden
    }

    // Find the dropdown button to insert the 'Hide' button after
    const dropdown = post.querySelector('[data-bs-toggle="dropdown"]');
    if (dropdown) {
        const hideButton = createHideButton(postHref);
        dropdown.parentNode.insertBefore(hideButton, dropdown.nextSibling);
    }
}

// MutationObserver callback to watch for changes in the DOM
const observerCallback = (mutationsList, observer) => {
    for (const mutation of mutationsList) {
        if (mutation.type === 'childList' && mutation.addedNodes.length > 0) {
            mutation.addedNodes.forEach(node => {
                if (node.nodeType === Node.ELEMENT_NODE) {
                    // Check if the added node is a post container
                    if (node.matches('div.post-listing, article.post-container')) {
                        processPost(node);
                    } else {
                        // Check if any child nodes are post containers
                        const postNodes = node.querySelectorAll('div.post-listing, article.post-container');
                        postNodes.forEach(processPost);
                    }
                }
            });
        }
    }
};

// Set up the MutationObserver to watch for changes in the entire document
const observer = new MutationObserver(observerCallback);
const config = { childList: true, subtree: true };

// Start observing the document
observer.observe(document.documentElement, config);

// Additionally, process any posts that are already in the DOM at script start
document.querySelectorAll('div.post-listing, article.post-container').forEach(processPost);

i think for creative tasks like writing, relying on LLMs entirely is just lazy and you can see that with AI Content farms on youtube.

counterpoint no

there's only one use case for AI that I currently support, and that is as some kind of search engine assistant, as is the case with the AI in Bing, and that's really depressing... the internet is so shitty that we have to ask the shittificator tool to make it less shitty for a split second

I remember when cleverbot was big. I spent a lot of time playing around with it and don't remember any outage against it. I don't think anyone was writing papers or coding stuff with cleverbot though

This reminds me of something I need to post about AI and accessibility tools. Thanks!