I don't know why they hate fun so much. For people who claim to love freedom and individuality they sure hate people expressing themselves in non-conforming ways.
I know they claim its because it's "unnatural" but you don't see them complaining about brunettes bleaching their hair to be blonde. Come to think of it, they don't have a problem with women using plastic surgery to have unnaturally large boobs either (unless they happen to be trans)
Hmmmmm :thinking-about-it:
It's less to do with the color itself and more because colored hair is associated with wokeness all the way back to 2014, at least. A lot of the most prominent targets of the internet mob had dyed hair. Chanty Binx comes to mind to me.
Chanty Binx
I can fix her.
And by "fix," I mean "supply her with an AK-47 and a copy of Mao's little red book."
..."In Minecraft."
They're mad won't fuck them
Literally that's it
Source: porn boards on 4chan
The women with pink and blue hair don't want to fuck them.
I used to date a blonde that was very interested in having piles of money and married a lobbyist who looks like that. He's now some Republican senators aid.
It's been just as confusing to me as their hatred of trans people, when they crave endless cartoon versions of both trans people (if crudely represented as fantastical "futas" and objectified entirely for their gaze) and people with unusual hair colors.
Honestly this might sound a bit simplistic but chuds are all about keeping things as bland, basic and conventional as it gets. A big underlining reason why almost all of them are racist, or at least believe in a level of white superiority is because they view white or white passing people as normal to them. Everyone else is different. They may like some parts of some cultures but ultimately they view themselves as the dominant race and culture. Having non conventional hair isn't normal, therefore it's bad. To them, women rejecting the conventional idea of what a woman looks or acts like is like an insult at the entire idea of what a womans purpose is to them. Lot of these dudes are just straight up misogynists and don't think women should have any agency over what they themselves want to look like. They're not falling in line.
Lot of them are just the most boring people you could ever talk to, very little original thoughts and just conform to superficial ideas of what things are supposed to be like. They have an extremely stunted idea of what self expression can be like
culture warriors transmute all political opinions into consumer categories, and direct rage at people who pursue certain aesthetics and products for fictive affiliation to hated groups.
these people still have sumptuary brain which is actually remarkable considering how long and hard capitalism has worked to eliminate it through consumer choice---realistically the ideal these sorts are imagining is just a different marketing category rather than genuine traditionalism though
you see, the chuds are actually anti imperialist, and deeply resent the treatment of the global south, and resent the labor abuses it takes to manufacture those dyes before they reach the first world...
just kidding, they're just reactionary misogynists and associate bright colored hair with leftism the same way we associate tattoos of nordic runes with being a nazi.
They form this perfect woman in their heads and when a real woman doesn't conform to that (oft unattainable) ideal, they get their testes in twist
Like those soft Victorian boys what only ever saw woman as marble statues and fainted when they saw pubic hair
but you don’t see them complaining about brunettes bleaching their hair to be blonde. Come to think of it, they don’t have a problem with women using plastic surgery to have unnaturally large boobs either
They may not hate them but definitely insult/make fun of them. They'll use any excuse to hate women tbh
Also fake blonde/fake boobs cannot be identified immediately unless its a bad job. Blue hair however is always obvious
Because it’s not “traditional “ and that is the most important thing to them. The aesthetic of having history.
