• InevitableSwing [none/use name]
      ·
      9 months ago

      While the decision was unanimous, the liberal justices wrote a sharp concurrence that accused the conservative majority of going further than needed

      Oh, my. Hohoohohooooooyhooasfoohooasfoi;jmsdkl;fmn iwaek ln sdaf oh shit.as.d fasdf'ojka;sdmkaf kjasdfiiidiiiiiiiiiiii                      oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooasd

      • itappearsthat
        ·
        9 months ago

        I have never read a harder cope sentence than "sharp concurrence". Like we make fun of these people for fetishizing losing and dissent, now they fetishize agreeing? What the actual fuck lmao?

        • InevitableSwing [none/use name]
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I like etymology and looking things up. But I don't think I even did a quickie google of the judge/justice use of "concurrence" because legal shit can be so tedious.

          ---

          Nina edit

          TIL - there's something even more lib than a "withering dissent". A "sharp concurrence" is the most lib thing possible. I thought a concurring opinion might be complicated. Nope. It's very simple.

          Concurring opinion

          In law, a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different (or additional) reasons as the basis for their decision.

          • D61 [any]
            ·
            9 months ago

            "A sternly unpleasant glare" dennis-stare

            • InevitableSwing [none/use name]
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Sotomayor Raised an Eyebrow after EVERY Ruling by Supercilious plays.

              ---

              supercilious [] Etymology: early 1500s from Latin superciliosus "haughty", from supercilium "eyebrow".

    • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I was honestly gonna guess 7-2 or something like that, with the dissenters arguing about how being impeached should impact legal ability to run again or something similar and technical, but without real standing

      Liberals continue to be more pathetic than expected